Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - US Senators call for removal of drink-drive apps
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

US Senators call for removal of drink-drive apps
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BigPerk
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 06, 2006
Posts: 1618
Location: East Hertfordshire

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not that it resolves the drink-drive question, but the discussion in
Quote:
Notifying other drivers of speed cameras is an offence?
was quite interesting in terms of warning people not to commit an offence, and warning people who were in the process of committing an offence.

But it also points out the difficulty of proving whether a speeding offence was actually being committed at the point the warning was given - guess the same applies to drink-drive.

BRING ON THE LAWYERS - THEY'LL SORT IT (or at least they wont go hungry - even if their clients do Rolling Eyes Twisted Evil )
_________________
David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

BigPerk wrote:
But it also points out the difficulty of proving whether a speeding offence was actually being committed at the point the warning was given - guess the same applies to drink-drive.
No. A breathalyser will prove a drunk driver AFTER the event quite easily. Speeding would be a lot more difficult to prove without the evidence of a speed gun
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skippy
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12
Posts: 2946
Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

scarsdale037 wrote:
I agree with the above point re speed cameras and black spots, but alerts for drink drive traps is another matter. Most people should agree that avoiding drink drive traps is morally unacceptable because it allows drink drivers to get away with it.


Really what it boils down to is that speeding is more socially acceptable than drink driving.

If people can promote a speed camera database as an "accident black spot" warning system then why can't people promote a drink driving checkpoint warning system in the same way?

To put a positive spin on the app:

"Hmmm, I'm going out tonight I wonder if I should drive. Let's check the app for checkpoints. Wow, the Police are out in force stopping drivers tonight, I might be having 1 or maybe two pints tonight so I won't take any chances and get a taxi instead."

Police are all for publicising their checkpoints, high impact, high visibility = high deterrent value = successful campaign. Their aim is NOT to catch a few people drink driving but to create a deterrent to encourage the wider population that it's unacceptable so they won't do it in the first place.
_________________
Gone fishing!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigPerk
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 06, 2006
Posts: 1618
Location: East Hertfordshire

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A breathalyser will prove a drunk driver AFTER the event quite easily.
True enough - but the main point in the discussions I referred to was (I think) the need to establish a link between the crime being committed by a particular person, and the warning being given by another particular person.

Quote:
Really what it boils down to is that speeding is more socially acceptable than drink driving.
No, I don't think the argument is this, at least in practical terms. If a driver decides NOT to drink more than the 'permitted' level because of the drink/drive checks or, conversely, a driver decides to take a different route to avoid cameras so he/she can break the speeding law anyway, then YES.

But I think that we are talking mainly about the attitude of people on this forum. I like to think that we DO (at least try to) use the camera database as an aid to keeping within the law. But a drink/drive database can hardly be considered to be encouraging the same care. That's why I suspect PGPSW would view these in the same light as the ANPR location databases - it is harder to believe that the people using them are really going to get themselves licensed and insured as a result! Rolling Eyes

BUT I certainly agree with what I think is being said, that being over the speed limit is no more defensible than being over the alcohol limit (BUT all a matter of degree of course - I wouldn't say either 81 blood level is the equivalent of 120 mph, any more than 120 blood level is the same as 71 on the motorway!)

Ho Hum ... Driving Cheers! Stop!
_________________
David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skippy wrote:
Their aim is NOT to catch a few people drink driving but to create a deterrent to encourage the wider population that it's unacceptable so they won't do it in the first place.
I must have missed your Very Happy. You mean just like speed cams are NOT to raise revenue but to create a deterrent to encourage the wider population that it's unacceptable to speed so they won't do it in the first place Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wildcard
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Nov 13, 2004
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:28 am    Post subject: Cut to the chase Reply with quote

If any driver told me they never exceeded the speed limit - frankly I wouldn't believe them -and I don't mean the odd couple of mph accidentally. On a good straight country road , perfect visibility , quiet Sunday traffic , empty dual carridgeway - come on now - who are trying to kid. If any speed cam subscriber told me they didn't need to slow down on an unfamiliar road when the warning came up - I wouldn't believe them either . The main purpose of the database is to avoid a ticket - and we do that by slowing down . So ultimately the purpose of safer roads is served and I don't see anything wrong in that. We are driving more slowly with the warnings than without.
Personally I find the TomTom speed limit database reasonably accurate ( not their cams of course ) - I have the warning set to on and use it to remind me to stick to the limit on busy residential streets in peak periods or in bad weather.
My pet hate is those self righteous , sanctimonious and ostentatiously "law abiding" (and dangerous ) drivers with a powerful car who break heavily on the approach to a 30mph sign - then accelerate hard on the exit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 30/12/2002 17:36:20
Posts: 4912
Location: Oxfordshire, England, UK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi NickG,

NickG wrote:
I no longer own a TomTom as I use the iPhone, which AFAIK doesn't even support the POI file.

The iPhone can run CamerAlert, written by Lutz of PGPSW, which can use the full PGPSW camera database and warn of cameras only in the direction of your travel and also automatically show your average speed in within SPECS areas.

I use the Android version of CamerAlert and it's excellent!

Have a look to see whether you are still a subscriber to the PGPSW camera database.

Regards,
_________________
Robert.
iPhone 6s Plus, iOS 14.0.1: iOS CamerAlert v2.0.7
TomTom GO Mobile iOS 2.3.1; TomTom (UK & ROI and Europe) iOS apps v1.29
Garmin Camper 770 LMT-D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mikealder
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 19638
Location: Blackpool , Lancs

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NickG wrote:
I no longer own a TomTom as I use the iPhone, which AFAIK doesn't even support the POI file.


Aother option is to install the camera POI's to the iPhone app as shown in This Thread - Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
BigPerk
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 06, 2006
Posts: 1618
Location: East Hertfordshire

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
My pet hate is those self righteous , sanctimonious and ostentatiously "law abiding" (and dangerous ) drivers
Maybe I'm one of those! Razz . I'll admit to doing this to some extent sometimes in the sort of circumstances described, but there comes a point where a driver can't be trusted to make his/her own rules up, surely?

"Perfect visibility" on an "unfamiliar road" for instance - ever come across a hidden side road, with a 'local's' car suddenly trundling out from nowhere?

I have to say MY pet hates are selfish, self-opinionated drivers who (a) sear past me at 100+, even if it is a motorway, assuming everyone else had better not impede them, or (b) park across two spaces (even 4 on one occasion!) in a busy/full car park, taking up the last space, because they can't be asked to be considerate. (if anything I hate (b) more than (a), because parking ought to be so easy for anyone, even if they can't drive properly!) Twisted Evil Rolling Eyes
_________________
David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Naomi
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Dec 07, 2005
Posts: 49

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would not condone a system that warns of drink/driving checkpoints. Drink driving implies a reduced level of attentiveness, skill, awareness etc. As such it causes drink drivers to make mistakes, some of which they are probably unaware of.
A drink drive checkpoint warning may well save a driver from being caught, but it may well then result in someone being killed a few hundred yards further down the road. Such warnings are wrong.

As for speed camera warning: I believe I drive safely. 25 years of no claims would help support that assertion. However many speed limits are inappropriate, and they take a one size fits all approach. They take no account of the weather, traffic, nor of the skill of the driver. A 30 limit or a 40 limit is as fine a gradation as you get. So many a road could actually be perfectly safe at 38mph, but would be designated a 30 limit. An experiernced driver would be perfectly safe at that 38 in good weather, and he/she would be concentrating on what he was doing. Add a need to speedo watch into the system and it adds a distraction that he does not need.

Before I got a SATNAV system with speed camera warnings, I was clocked at 36 in a 30 zone once. I was driving very carefully on a sunny afternoon, with little traffic. I thought it was a 40 limit, one I viewed as appropriate. It turned out that the 30 limit sign had become totally obscured by foliage, and I had been unable to see it. I was summonsed but convinced them to drop the charge, but only after an appearance in the magistrates court, with a scheduled crown court apperance being dropped only after I wrote a long angst- stricken letter. This won't happen again. I will continue to drive carefully, and will have that extra protection against inadvertently, but safely, drifting over a limit. Thanks to speed camera warnings.

It takes a lot of extra concentration to drive at 28/29/30 rather than to drive at a speed which experience tells you is safe for the day and road in question. I can better use my concentration in looking out for hazards.
_________________
Too many people "search for the zero inside themselves". Sadly, many fail to find even that.

Nao
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Naomi wrote:
Drink driving implies a reduced level of attentiveness, skill, awareness etc. As such it causes drink drivers to make mistakes, some of which they are probably unaware of.
And speeding does not cause the above. Boy racers egged on by peer pressure possibly excepted.
Naomi wrote:
An experiernced driver would be perfectly safe at that 38 in good weather, and he/she would be concentrating on what he was doing. Add a need to speedo watch into the system and it adds a distraction that he does not need.
No. People would still think it was too slow and complain that they have to speedo watch
Font size will be reduced after mid day Very Happy


Last edited by M8TJT on Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cornz
Lifetime Member


Joined: 05/01/2003 10:51:57
Posts: 118
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I see cameras as revenue generators and the more i can deprive the government of my hard earned taxable income the better.
Car users pay through the bloody nose for the right to transport...I dont see ministers, politicians etc at the filling station, or in the post office queue for their tax disks....Why? because once again, we, the workers and drivers pay it for them. They are not feathering their nests at my (more) expense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
gettingmad
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Aug 27, 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:10 pm    Post subject: Why I use camera alerts Reply with quote

I try to comply with all speed limits and I have held a clean licence since 1973 but when you are driving in an area you don't know it is easy to turn out of a minor road onto a major one and get a ticket before you pass a speed limit sign informing you of what the local limit is. The speed camera alerts can save you from doing this as you are most likely to be using the satnav in an area you don't know!

It is also easy for your speed to creep up, especially downhill or when following another vehicle. I check the speedo regularly but can find I am 3-4 over the limit and have to reduce speed when I do so. A camera at such a spot (frequently located near the bottom of hills) could catch me out.

Drink drive alerts are another thing altogether. If you know you have had too much to drink you should not drive. Warning people where they are likely to be checked encourages irresponsible behaviour and a feeling that the offender is immune to prosecution. You can't accidentally have a drink too many but you can easily speed accidentally.

£20 a year is a good investment to help a law abiding citizen keep the law.


Last edited by gettingmad on Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:22 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ianandcarol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: May 04, 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:21 pm    Post subject: Drink Drive Trap Apps Reply with quote

I can see no justification for this type of warning as drinking & driving is dangerous regardless of what speed or type of road you are on i.e. You would always be "AN ACCIDENT BLACKSPOT" waiting to happen.
The speed camera database/warning enables one to be aware of dangerous sections of road & accident blackspots which are not readily discernible when driving and of course this is also the justification that the authorities use for installing them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeB
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 20/08/2002 11:51:57
Posts: 3859
Location: Essex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Drink Drive Trap Apps Reply with quote

ianandcarol wrote:
I can see no justification for this type of warning as drinking & driving is dangerous regardless of what speed or type of road you are on i.e. You would always be "AN ACCIDENT BLACKSPOT" waiting to happen....

Just to be controversial the justification for this would be for regular people with no inclination to drink and drive or take drugs and drive to avoid the traps and so continue on with their journey in a timely manner.

I have been stuck in a queue in Holland where they regularly have these roadblocks for over 30 minutes a delay I could do without.

Whilst I abhor people who are incapable of driving I support proper means of detection rather than an arbitrary roadblock inconveniencing a very large number of drivers in an effort to catch (hopefully) a very small number of offenders.
_________________
Mike Barrett
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping