View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DougWeller Regular Visitor
Joined: May 28, 2004 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:40 pm Post subject: Sensitivity |
|
|
I've been seriously considering buying that and understood that it would be work pretty well in woods, etc, at least as sensitive as the Garmin 60CS.
Now I'm reading that it has poor sensitivity. That's a deal killer for me, is it really the case?
Doug _________________ Doug Weller
Doug's Skeptical Archaeology site:
http://www.ramtops.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rog62 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 04, 2008 Posts: 27 Location: Bucks
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used mine for the first time in a wooded area this week - whilst mountain biking with the Active 10 in its case in the top of my rucsac - a quick examination of the track when I got back indicates that it tracked my movements correctly...far better than the results I was getting from a Garmin Geko....This was a short ride - 10 miles but almost 100% on tracks/paths in wooded areas.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bluewomble Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 02, 2008 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've used my Active10 (with v1.03 of the firmware) twice so far in woodlands with no problems, although there aren't any leaves on the trees at the moment which might help I guess...
I have it mounted on my my bike on the stem with the bike mount.
On both trips it was showing the correct position whenever I looked at it and the track log showed me exactly where I thought I had been. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have used mine quite a number of times in a heavy forest that is evergreen - large tall pine trees, no problems with reception - I thought it might struggle a little but it performed excellently, I have had other SiRF-III GPS devices fail at this location when previously tried - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
robs1972 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Mar 19, 2007 Posts: 310 Location: Plymouth
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have no problems with sensitivity except when I take the unit off the bike and then carry it around a shop/garage mid ride or ride through a road tunnel and then it returns straight away when in the open air again. _________________ I like mapping, I like mapping, I like mapping and I like to map! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Physicist Occasional Visitor
Joined: Nov 08, 2007 Posts: 57 Location: Cambridge
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
More on A10 sensitivity. There appear to be some users who are entirely happy with the sensitivity but there are others - who perhaps have prior experience of the Garmin 60CSx and other SIRF III receivers - who are disappointed with it.
I can illustrate the different sensitivities/acquisition anecdotally. Indoors (in a ground-floor flat) I can get 3-4 satellites on the Garmin and nothing on the A10. Take the receiver outdoors and I may get 8-10 satellites on the Garmin but typically a couple less on the A10. The position acquisition only takes 30-60 s on the Garmin but often 15-30 minutes on the A10 (these are 'cold start' figures). Leaving both sets switched on I head off into dense woodland; both sets will continue to lock. But now switch both off in the dense coverage; the Garmin will within seconds determine your location. To get a new fix with the A10 I often have to find a clearing and once lock has been achieved head back into the woods. If you just look at the track on the A10 you may think you are getting a continuous signal. If you look at the satellite page you may find outages in dense tree cover which is less apparent as the set connects the signal outage/restore points with a straight line. I have used both sets in Horner Wood on Exmoor (tree cover in deep gorge); I only get 2-3 satellites on the A10 and hence no fix but around 6 on the Garmin. I would summarise the situation by saying that the A10 has about the sensitivity of my Magellan XL or may earlier Garmin 60CS but takes longer to get a fix than either.
These observations are based on two different A10s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin_b Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm one of the unhappy ones!
mine can take several minutes to get a fix. This is on open heath land less than a mile from my home. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jay1967 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 01, 2006 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Physicist wrote: | More on A10 sensitivity. There appear to be some users who are entirely happy with the sensitivity but there are others - who perhaps have prior experience of the Garmin 60CSx and other SIRF III receivers - who are disappointed with it.
I can illustrate the different sensitivities/acquisition anecdotally. Indoors (in a ground-floor flat) I can get 3-4 satellites on the Garmin and nothing on the A10. Take the receiver outdoors and I may get 8-10 satellites on the Garmin but typically a couple less on the A10. The position acquisition only takes 30-60 s on the Garmin but often 15-30 minutes on the A10 (these are 'cold start' figures). Leaving both sets switched on I head off into dense woodland; both sets will continue to lock. But now switch both off in the dense coverage; the Garmin will within seconds determine your location. To get a new fix with the A10 I often have to find a clearing and once lock has been achieved head back into the woods. If you just look at the track on the A10 you may think you are getting a continuous signal. If you look at the satellite page you may find outages in dense tree cover which is less apparent as the set connects the signal outage/restore points with a straight line. I have used both sets in Horner Wood on Exmoor (tree cover in deep gorge); I only get 2-3 satellites on the A10 and hence no fix but around 6 on the Garmin. I would summarise the situation by saying that the A10 has about the sensitivity of my Magellan XL or may earlier Garmin 60CS but takes longer to get a fix than either.
These observations are based on two different A10s. |
so what is the SNR reading of your A10 when you are 'not getting a fix' with it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martin_b Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 02, 2006 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just tested mine again,
Standing outside in the "same position" as it was last used, ( in a wide open space) my unit took 4mins 45 sec to get a fix. this is with new batteries. In comparison my Nuvi unit inside the car takes about 30sec.
If I hadn't battered mine about a bit I'd send it back! What i will say though is once it has a fix it seems pretty good at keeping it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jay1967 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 01, 2006 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martin_b wrote: | Just tested mine again,
Standing outside in the "same position" as it was last used, ( in a wide open space) my unit took 4mins 45 sec to get a fix. this is with new batteries. In comparison my Nuvi unit inside the car takes about 30sec.
If I hadn't battered mine about a bit I'd send it back! What i will say though is once it has a fix it seems pretty good at keeping it. |
stood outside in my garden, house 10m behind me, 6 foot fence 4 m to my right, 30ft trees 30m infront of me. SaMap was unused for 12 hours. Cold start and locked position in 1m 50s. Powered off, off for 10s, powered on, got lock 40 seconds.
When put in heading Up position, maps span for over 2 mins.. very disconcerting. SNR reading between 30-35.
This is not as good as the Garmin 60CSx. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lucevans Frequent Visitor
Joined: Mar 21, 2007 Posts: 261 Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | stood outside in my garden, house 10m behind me, 6 foot fence 4 m to my right, 30ft trees 30m infront of me. SaMap was unused for 12 hours. Cold start and locked position in 1m 50s. Powered off, off for 10s, powered on, got lock 40 seconds.
When put in heading Up position, maps span for over 2 mins.. very disconcerting. SNR reading between 30-35.
This is not as good as the Garmin 60CSx. |
Where in the Satmap does it display the SNR? I've looked everywhere I can think of, and there is distinct lack of any kind of technical info - a bit disappointing to someone who's come from a Garmin Map 60CSx (I like the Garmin satellite view screen and can work out where in the sky the birds are...something I can't do by looking at the Satmap screen ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jay1967 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 01, 2006 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lucevans wrote: | Quote: | stood outside in my garden, house 10m behind me, 6 foot fence 4 m to my right, 30ft trees 30m infront of me. SaMap was unused for 12 hours. Cold start and locked position in 1m 50s. Powered off, off for 10s, powered on, got lock 40 seconds.
When put in heading Up position, maps span for over 2 mins.. very disconcerting. SNR reading between 30-35.
This is not as good as the Garmin 60CSx. |
Where in the Satmap does it display the SNR? I've looked everywhere I can think of, and there is distinct lack of any kind of technical info - a bit disappointing to someone who's come from a Garmin Map 60CSx (I like the Garmin satellite view screen and can work out where in the sky the birds are...something I can't do by looking at the Satmap screen ) |
The SNR is on the Satellite Display Screen, middle right of the screen. Yes, the manual is very limited and the SNR is not mentioned from what I can see! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lucevans Frequent Visitor
Joined: Mar 21, 2007 Posts: 261 Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The SNR is on the Satellite Display Screen, middle right of the screen. Yes, the manual is very limited and the SNR is not mentioned from what I can see! |
Of course it is! I don't know what I was thinking....thanks Jay1967. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jay1967 Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 01, 2006 Posts: 75
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:02 pm Post subject: Garmin 60CSx vs SatMap |
|
|
Garmin 60CSx vs SatMap - small test .. after placing both units on my table indoors (where i always get between 5 & 10 satellites) both units showed the same number of satellites in view and both units were unable to lock on to any satellites.
ps. how does one show images in the post? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You need to host the image on the net then link to it on the forum, image shack is a good free site that supports forum links and accepting uploads.
As you had two GPS devices on the table were they close together? if so I am not surprised the reception is poor, close proximity causes interference and will result in a longer time to acquire a position fix, or under poor reception conditions you might never get a lock on either device. Even with a fix two devices close together will compromise the accuracy.
If you don't believe me get both devices showing a position fix, watch the SNR on both devices as you draw them closer together - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|