Trying to update a camera for several months.

[mrg2003]

Here is the photo graphic evidence



This gatso turned into a warning sign several months ago. Will it ever be updated properly


Mr.G

[RobBrady]

Hi Mr G

Many thanks for your submission.

I'm not saying that this is the case with your submission, but for general information it is worth noting that we get dozens of incorrect entries. These are not malicious, just genuine mistakes with submitters entering the wrong data. So whilst someone is absolutely certain that they've submitted a correction, it isn't necessarily so that we have included their data.

We also sometimes, though rarely, have to wait longer than we would hope for some cameras to be verified. Overall, we're pleased to report that month on month the quality and volume is increasing, but, by the very nature of the beast, inevitably the odd correction might take a bit of time putting in an appearance.

I have passed this information on to the compilers. The photograph is very helpful, thank you
_________________
Robert Brady

[mrg2003]

[smstextaddict]

why oh why oh why do i bother submitting camera locations when 4 months on you still have not included them, what seems to be the problem as im really getting fed up wasting my time entering the camera locations to find you not adding them.

[smstextaddict]

also mobile 7196 to name a few is actually 30mph not 60 mph as the mobile unit are targeting vehicles on the way out of town, yes they can target vehicles out of the 30 mph zone the other way to, but surely as its set up in a 30mph limit and can target 30mph that that should be the limit set?

We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?.
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!