View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sausage27 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Dec 13, 2006 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Sat Sep 21, 2013 9:21 am Post subject: Average Speed Check |
|
|
I regularly go through the 50 mph roadworks on the M25 (north) and about a month ago I noticed the speed on my 740 was showing 49 and not wavering, I normally set my speed to the satnav rather than the speedo.
I also noticed a line across the top of the number.
Initially I though the satnav had gone wrong but on clearing the last average speed camera it reverted to normal operation.
Kept a look out for it next time I went through and sure enough there is the line again. Sussed it was showing me my average speed (it came on at the first camera and off at the last)
But the last couple of times I've been through there it doesn't do it anymore.
Was this experimental? Has anyone else noticed it?
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like TomTom speed rather than your own speed. Do you have it set to show max speed alongside your speed, i.e. do you get two speeds showing, namely your speed with speed limit (according to TomTom) alongside it?
Do you have two speeds bottom left as in this screenshot and which one was doing the 49 with a line? The one on the right is TomTom speed limit and they did at one time seem to start showing the supposed average speed limit, but it was very flaky. It started doing it for my local M4/M5 set for a while, but then stopped (This is an ancient screendump, not recent and not of my local roadworks).
_________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
layingback Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
The bar over the top is Average speed based on where TT thinks the cameras are/were.
As you go through the 1st camera (or TT's location of it ;-) ) the display disappears totally AT A VERY CRITICAL TIME for a few seconds, then reappears with the bar.
It's useful - BUT ONLY IF TT PLACED THE CAMERAS CORRECTLY - but it's UI could be improved. Eg. that delay at beginning is inexcusable (why take out the normal display if the average version isn't ready yet?), it is no help at the intermediate cameras, the current speed should still be displayed some where in a smaller font - because of those intermediate cameras eg, and a short freeze of the final average speed at the end would be good, so you can get a final check.
Overall a well overdue addition, but let's hope it's not TT's final rendition of this feature. _________________ Go Premium X / Go 1005 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Confirmed - the figure with a bar over it is the calculated average speed you are doing throught the SPECs camera zone.
It's not a particularily new feature, my TomToms have been doing it for ages.
@layingback, I'm not sure why you're worried about the instantaneous speed disply disappearing momentarily as you enter the first camera or why you say the average speed display is of no use as you pass the intermediate cameras?
The SPECS cameras ONLY read your registration number and pass that to the system which works out your average speed. They do not measure your actual speed at the camera at all. _________________ "Settling in nicely" ;-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
layingback Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P wrote: | @layingback, I'm not sure why you're worried about the instantaneous speed disply disappearing momentarily as you enter the first camera or why you say the average speed display is of no use as you pass the intermediate cameras? |
That would be true if TT's camera locations were in the correct place!
Also the SPECS site says they can compute speed between any 2 cameras in a sequence, and TT is only averaging 1st to last (if they have them correct) as far as I can see.
And for the record the usual speed display is not 'instantaneous' - it's a (probably) weighted average over the last 5 seconds (at least that's what TeleAtlas' own version was IIRC). So while more accurate, eg at a steady speed, than many rigged car speedos, you need to be aware of what you are being shown. You are presumably aware of that, just wanted to be clear to others reading this. _________________ Go Premium X / Go 1005 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But TA don't calculate speed, they make maps. Apart from that, the instantaneous speed (velocity, actually) can be obtained from the satellite chipset to a high degree of accuracy. Having said that, the speed algorithm in the nav software could possibly use a 'weighted average'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unless there's been a change, I think you'll also find that TT's average speed is calculated from the start of the zone and is not recalculated between cameras on a multi-camera stretch.
For my local set, that caused real alarm - as I approached the junction (M5 to M4), there was a traffic holdup meaning that as I entered the zone I was doing about 5mph. It cleared very quickly, so that by the time the next camera came up, we were travelling freely. PGPSW's CamerAlert programme on my iPhone correctly recalculated my average from there, but the TT Live device was still calculating from when I started at 5mph - and showed my average as lower than it really was! _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
layingback Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 124
|
Posted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | But TA don't calculate speed, they make maps. |
S'OK, I can remember what products I released ;-) (Was actually earlier Skymap version in 1997, plus a UK version in '98, but original Navigator was way back in 1985!) A single GPS speed value can contain huge errors, hence weighting.
DennisN wrote: | Unless there's been a change, I think you'll also find that TT's average speed is calculated from the start of the zone and is not recalculated between cameras on a multi-camera stretch.
For my local set, that caused real alarm - as I approached the junction (M5 to M4), there was a traffic holdup meaning that as I entered the zone I was doing about 5mph. It cleared very quickly, so that by the time the next camera came up, we were travelling freely. PGPSW's CamerAlert programme on my iPhone correctly recalculated my average from there, but the TT Live device was still calculating from when I started at 5mph - and showed my average as lower than it really was! |
Precisely my concern ... _________________ Go Premium X / Go 1005 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
psyskiesman Lifetime Member
Joined: Jun 22, 2004 Posts: 322 Location: Swindon, Wiltshire
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you were to treat the average speed cameras as fixed speed cameras you wouldn't have to worry about your average speed; in the 50mph average speed zone on the M5 just don't go over 50mph and you'll be ok! It's not like it's hundreds of miles in length; you'll only lose a couple of seconds by staying at 50mph maximum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can now confirm that today I got the speed with a line above it on M4 at Bristol 50mph average speed zone. The speed shown was different from (invariably lower than) the average speed shown in PGPSW's CamerAlert on my iPhone. I feel confident of the pgpsw figure based on past experience, although I have no personal means of checking either pgpsw or TT. On my first run through, the speed stayed constant 43mph all the way through. On my second run, I deliberately speeded up and nudged 50 to try and get it to show higher - CamerAlert did respond and edged up to average 48, the GO edged up from 43 to 44 - I guess I would have had to drive over 50 for some distance to get it anywhere near 50.
This only happened with my GO550 Live. It did not happen with my GO 1005 Live, nor with my Renault (TT) R-Link Live (but then, nothing happens with the Renault thing!!). _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
psyskiesman wrote: | If you were to treat the average speed cameras as fixed speed cameras you wouldn't have to worry about your average speed; in the 50mph average speed zone on the M5 just don't go over 50mph and you'll be ok! It's not like it's hundreds of miles in length; you'll only lose a couple of seconds by staying at 50mph maximum. | In which case you don't need to consider a SPECS cam as anything. And if you always drive at or below the speed limit you don't have to treat speed cameras as anything so why are you on a site dedicated to speed cameras? Why do you treat the average speed cameras as fixed speed cameras. They don't measure your instantaneous speed. Your logic defies any common sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I always drive at or below the speed limit. I just like that nice lady talking to me every time a camera goes by! _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JockTamsonsBairn Lifetime Member
Joined: Jan 10, 2004 Posts: 2777 Location: Bonnie Scotland (West Central)
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
psyskiesman wrote: | If you were to treat the average speed cameras as fixed speed cameras you wouldn't have to worry about your average speed | If you charge through the section and then slam your brakes on when you come to the camera, your average speed is likely to exceed the set limit. _________________ Jock
TomTom Go 940 LIVE (9.510, Europe v915.5074 on SD & 8.371, WCE v875.3613 on board) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's a rather selective quote Jock. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14901 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2013 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | That's a rather selective quote Jock. | But VERY accurate and apposite. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|