Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
SurfShark Antivirus
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Has anyone used the LiPol battery pack yet?
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Has anyone used the LiPol battery pack yet?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Satmap Active 10
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
IanHibbert
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does the rechargeable pack need to be removed to stop it draining under v1.16?

Thanks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not from my experience.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
mikealder
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 19638
Location: Blackpool , Lancs

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having just tried measuring the current drawn from the active10 while switched off I get no noticable difference between the battery plugged in to the device or when disconnected, so it looks like the current draw issue might have been resolved.
I will try this test with other measurment equipment to make sure but the kit I used is good enough for a quick "look see" :

CFD 200 CF DMM card
ipaq-4700 PDA
Fluke i30 Clamp

There is a picture of this set up which I have used before for similar testing, the only difference this time was the new software and the rechargable battery:



Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
IanHibbert
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 34

PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks folks, looking good at last!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul_ffitch
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Ipswich

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry to damp this hope down, but I have just measured the current consumption of my 1.16 Satmap when switched off. It show at the same 32 to 34mA that it did on V1.03 of the firmware. So I'm afraid it looks like we will have to keep on taking the batteries out...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lucevans
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Mar 21, 2007
Posts: 261
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul_ffitch wrote:
Sorry to damp this hope down, but I have just measured the current consumption of my 1.16 Satmap when switched off. It show at the same 32 to 34mA that it did on V1.03 of the firmware. So I'm afraid it looks like we will have to keep on taking the batteries out...


Was that using AAs? There has been some suggestion that the same inconvenient power-off drain doesn't occur for some reason when using the dedicated Lipol battery.

Has anyone confirmed or disproved Mike's data when using the LiPol battery?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My multimeter is flat so I haven't measured it but I can confirm from my usage that there is no observable loss of charge when left unused for three days.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Paul_ffitch
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 04, 2008
Posts: 19
Location: Ipswich

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I measured the 32mA drain with rechargable NiMH AAs. Not sure why LiPOL would be different, but I can't confirm as I haven't got one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul_ffitch wrote:
I measured the 32mA drain with rechargable NiMH AAs. Not sure why LiPOL would be different, but I can't confirm as I haven't got one.

It connects differently which may have some bearing on the issue?
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
mikealder
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 19638
Location: Blackpool , Lancs

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I decided to try this again as I have more time available today, measuring low current with a clamp is never too easy, to increase the signal being measured I made ten turns of cable through the head of the clamp, this works out to 1mV = 1mA when used this way.

First of all with the active10 not connected the probe is set as close to zero as possible



When connected, with the active10 off there is around the 32-34mA as can been seen on the iPAQ display



This constant burden will eventually flatten the battery, but as it is rechargeable this is not as much of an issue as flattening Lithium disposable cells was.
When I tried this the other night with a single pass through the probe the signal was so low it was lost in the noise as the meter reading wanders around by +/-2mV - Mike
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
lucevans
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Mar 21, 2007
Posts: 261
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK

PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikealder wrote:
I decided to try this again as I have more time available today, measuring low current with a clamp is never too easy, to increase the signal being measured I made ten turns of cable through the head of the clamp, this works out to 1mV = 1mA when used this way.

First of all with the active10 not connected the probe is set as close to zero as possible

When connected, with the active10 off there is around the 32-34mA as can been seen on the iPAQ display

This constant burden will eventually flatten the battery, but as it is rechargeable this is not as much of an issue as flattening Lithium disposable cells was.
When I tried this the other night with a single pass through the probe the signal was so low it was lost in the noise as the meter reading wanders around by +/-2mV - Mike


Thanks for doing the test mike. Thumbs Up

Does anyone know whether this constant drain is an issue that could be fixed in firmware, or is it a limitation of the hardware?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Satmap Active 10 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.105 (30 Oct 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping