Similar to the research about trying to follow a route on a sat nav. How does keeping an image of the manouevre in your mind differ between a road atlas and a sat nav? If anything I'd have thought the sat nav needed less attention?

Mike R [aka Wyvern46]
Go 530T - unsupported
Go550 Live [not renewed]
Kia In-dash Tomtom

It's even MORE dangerous driving without common sense,

(for the idiots who end up in streams etc, and blame their sat nav)

Can they say 'RED' backwards?? ;-)

HTC OneX (IceCreamSandwich), HTC DesireHD (Gingerbread) Co-Pilot Premium, GoogleMaps+CamerAlert352
TomTomOne (Original with the faster processor!)
v7.903, o/s 2344, GPSv1.21 Boot 5.0500
Mv710.1561(W Europe)+Traffic, N82 connection to GPRS traffic
+

You are far more likely to stop to read a map.

As has been said, I think it's a lot more distracting trying to remember directions from a map, but it's not just sat navs, what about volume of traffic, complicated road layouts, traffic signs, one way systems, speed cameras and traffic calming etc etc, thye're all adding to increased memory & work load. In the face of all those I'd rather have a sat nav than paper maps, notes or trying to remember where I'm going

Galaxy Note 4 / TomTom GO : CamerAlert : CoPilot

But those things are normal driving 'hazards' for which you don't have to remember and can be seen by looking out of the window. I agree that I would prefer a satnav to paper maps, but that's not the point that the University were making. It is generally accepted that phone calls distract a great deal even when hands free, the University is just effectively saying that the satnav does it as well.

Have to agree. Nearly had a head on the other day as the other driver was on the wrong side of the road going the wrong way through a junction (as in the wrong side of the small island/bollard) and peering around the satnav as it was right in front of them on the windscreen.

I don't think that that was the point the University were making, but equally as valid and illegal

What always amazes me is the number of people (including a TV reporter during this week's Panorama program) who place the SatNav unit directly in their line of sight on the windscreen thereby significantly reducing their view of road obstacles, particularly the nearside kerb/pavement.

The differences between a paper map and a SatNav is that the paper map is a single image which is retained as a snapshot, but the SatNav is a moving image, requiring a huge amount more processing power from the visual cortex, which can interrupt other visual streams.

Grief, there are all sorts of distractions that could cause us to crash - two kids fighting in the back for stressed out mum just one example.

It's a marvel that universities are allowed to waste money researching the obvious but equally a marvel that we're not all involved in a crash every day.

Tim
------------

Samsung Galaxy S4, Galaxy Tablet S, TomTom. Osmand+ and Sygic. Ex-TomTom Go 1000 Live, ex-TomTom Go 700, ex-TomTom truck, ex Navman/Ipaq