Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Safety Camera Partnerships
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Safety Camera Partnerships

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Non-Technical Speed Camera Discussions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jimtherev
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Apr 27, 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:10 am    Post subject: Safety Camera Partnerships Reply with quote

Darren wrote in this morning's Newsletter:
Quote:
It's time we all started asking questions of these groups. All too often when put under close scrutiny the accident data supporting the installation of a camera has been proved to be false. When will we stop accepting the status quo without questioning it?


Yup. Agree with all of that. But how? The very nature of the so-called 'Parnerships' is that one is denied access to data; this makes any challenge difficult. Individual enquiries are but pinpricks, answers will probably be delayed until the information is so old as to be irrelevant, or, worse still, enquiries ignored until the enquirer uses the 'steam hammer' of the Freedom of Information Act.

The whole ethos of the SCP - secrecy, non-accountability, seemingly-random actions and so on - is what is under question here. The only way anyone could get any change is to challenge this ethos at national level. I'm not sure who is powerful enough to do this... even the mighty PocketGPSWorld Wink would probably find this a challenge too far.

Or would we?
Jim
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15142
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

you could maybe try writing to a local paper and seeing if they would be willing to look into it? give them some info on other known fake results etc and it may perk up some interest for a bit of investigative journalism rather than the usual 'small boy loses toy dog' stories local papers are often plagued with...!

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's apathy that is the problem here. Most of us have no interest until we are prosecuted for speeding and feel aggrieved, possibly because we honestly believe we weren't speeding, maybe even because we weren't!

But it is time every driver started to question why these partnerships were allowed to form let alone continue to exist.

Why, when it is the police and the police alone, who are responsible for road traffic, do we need these partnerships?

OK, preaching to the converted here but what we can do is submit Freedom of Information requests to our local partnerships. Ask them for siting criteria for a camera site, accident data pre and post installation.

Get your local papers involved and while you're at it, write to your MP or local councillors.

Until people like this realise that we are suddenly waking up to this issue they will continue to do whatever they please without fear of our asking searching questions.

Forums such as Pepipoo.com are a great place to discuss these matters and drum up support and the Association of British Drivers are also beginning to question the powers and organisation of SCP's and why they are run without clear mandates and oversight of any sort.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15142
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

it could be quite useful for someone with better writing skills than me to put together a 'standard' letter that could be sent as a FOI request covering all the points that would be required. also a standard letter that could be sent to mp's / papers. if they receive quite a few then they might start questioning things themselves...

i wonder if it could be a joint project with pepipoo?

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Non-Technical Speed Camera Discussions All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.051 (01 May 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping