Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
Read the current newsletter! Weekly
Newsletter
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Luxury 4 bedroom villa for rent in the Disney Orlando Florida area.
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Talex lite - Using the PocketGPSWorld database
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Talex lite - Using the PocketGPSWorld database
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Hardware based GPS SCD Systems
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sneeks
Lifetime Member


Joined: Feb 17, 2006
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the time has come to replace my Talex Lite. I think I'll look into buying a Road Angel Professional Connected and possibly keep the Talex unit in the cupboard until we have news on if it works or not with the PGPSW database.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
silentwol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm currently busy revising for my exams... I'll continue work on this in a few weeks once they're over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peddleston
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jun 02, 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:20 am    Post subject: tslex lite Reply with quote

if you solve this I would be very interested
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
silentwol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, exams are finished so I'll start work on this again soon. Could I get subscriber status back or could someone copy and paste the testing report posted in the subscriber forum please?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

silentwol wrote:
Hi, exams are finished so I'll start work on this again soon. Could I get subscriber status back or could someone copy and paste the testing report posted in the subscriber forum please?

Subscriber status renewed Smile
_________________
Darren Griffin - Editor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
silentwol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 2:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Soulman
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any further word on this ?

Is it still progressing ?

Regards,
Soulman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Soulman
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 13

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Soulman wrote:
Any further word on this ?

Is it still progressing ?

Regards,
Soulman.


Hello..............is there anybody there ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thearcher
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 05, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i was wondering that myself Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Our database admin who is liaising with the chap who is doing the work here is indisposed at present. I have no information so at present unless silentwol has an update you'll have to wait I'm afraid.
_________________
Darren Griffin - Editor


Last edited by Darren on Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 14703
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

not heard anything back from silentwol for a bit...

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 6497
Location: West London & Reading

PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was one of the beta testers of the first release and I've not heard anything either.

I did leave silentwol with a few suggestions and a list of the cameras I tested against and I know he was going to look into the problems.
_________________
Satnav:
Garmin DS61 LMT-D (In the car)
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
asantaga
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:22 pm    Post subject: Any news? Reply with quote

Hi silentwol

Any news if you've started up this project again after your exams?

Hopefully your sitting next to a beach having a good break :-)

Angelo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
silentwol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, sorry for leaving you guys in limbo. I've been enjoying a bit of a break Smile Also, the need for working on things that can earn money must take priority over hobbies ;)

Anyway, I've been thinking about this project on and off for a while. I've made no real progress since the beta release. What I have proved is that it is possible to get your own database running on the talex. Very little of the database format is now undocumented and what is left is easy to work out (e.g. what byte equals what camera type - all you need to do is drive up to a location, note the alert given by the talex and job done).

The problem is converting the PGSW database to to the talex way of doing things. Although the format is known (i.e. what bytes mean what - the way the data is organised and what it means), the way the talex works is quite different to the way the PGPSW detection works. It needs entirely different types of data. See previous posts by me which goes into more detail.

I tried to write a computer program that would read a map of Britain and do this conversion automatically. While this works quite well in rural areas and places with 'simple' road layouts, it easily gets confused around more built up areas (London!). This leaves me with a dilemma. Try and improve the program or give up. Sadly, I don't think I'm up to the challenge and even if I am, I certainly don't have enough time to work on it. It is a truely complex problem.

So, basically, I'm giving up on making an automated program to do the conversion. However, I think there is one last option left. If we can get enough people together, we can process the cameras by hand. We can use the program to give us a rough template... hopefully 50% or so of the cameras are converted properly by the program. We could have a system similar to PGPSW's with an online map that can have 'pointers' added to it and rotated into place. Thus anything the program misses or does incorrectly can be fixed by a human. I'd try and make it into a fairly streamlined process, so that it would hopefully take a minute or so per camera maximum, but the time still adds up. Last I remember, there were ~13000 cameras in the database. So if we could get 100 people doing 130 each, I think the task is fairly managable (two hours each). Once the database has been done, only new cameras need to be added, so this huge investment in time need only happen once.

The other option is that I write up everything I've found out and pass the baton onto someone else. However, I think somewhere down there line there is going to have to be a sizeable amount of human time spent checking any automatically converted database as the subject is just too risky to trust on something so fallible.

So, if people are willing to spend a bit of time working on this project, then I'm happy to help out Smile Thoughts, commennts etc welcome Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
silentwol
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 15, 2008
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, I'd like to make one more suggestion.

The talex has two sets of data (again, this is explained in a previous post, but I'll explain it here again).

Set1: Two points (i.e. long, lat and bearing) are placed 500 yards (or is it 400? I forget!) either side of the camera location (or as far as the raod will take you). So if you appraoch the camera from either direction you get a correct, early warning. This differs from the standard PGPSW implementation, which just has long, lat and bearing (and a flag saying it's bi-directional or not). Thus the tomtom makes an alert when you're within a certain radius of this location and optionally pointing in the right direction. (this is at least my understanding of the tomtom system).

Set2: Points are put (long, lat and bearing) at each juction that joins inbetween the above two points in Set1. he diagram below shows PGPSW data first, then Set1 data, then Set2 data). Small red points represent the actual data in each set and big red sploges show where I've drawn on the actual camera positions by hand)


So, as you pass over one of these points you get the warning "entering safety camera potection zone". Also, if you leave the road before coming to a gatso and pass one of these points in the opposite direction, the little timer thing will be removed and talex will give you the all clear.



So, in conclusion, Set1 is only two points per camera. These would be incredibly quick to do by hand and are pretty well placed by my program. We could really rocket though all these. Set2 however can have many points per camera, especially in places like London.

Why am I rambling on about this? The talex requires Set1, but NOT Set2. Without Set2 you don't get the "entering safety camera protection zone". Not a big deal in my opinion. Also, both the novus and talex databases don't include full Set2 data. In fact, I believe Novus stopped bothering with adding it entirely! This is not a hardware limitation, I think they just couldn't be bothered. I'm not sure about Talex as I don't have a subscription, but I'd supstect they're doing the same.

So, my suggestion is that we go through adding Set1 data, which wont take too much time and will get the PGPSW database running on your talex's. Then, once that's done, we can start work on the Set2 data where we feel it is appropriate.

Also, as an incentive, maybe PGPSW could give a year's subscription or something to anyone that makes say 300 submissions or more? Obviously this is up to PGPSW, but it might be a nice way of persuading people to help. I'd also like to point out that I think this way of having data (set1 and set2, compared to the PGPSW way) is a lot more robust (think less false positivies as you pass under bridges etc) and it might also be nice to try and implement these kinds of alerts on tomtoms too. So this data might not be resitrcted to just the talex. I'm not sure how tomtom works, but can you write plugins for it? I'd certainly be interested in writing one if other people aren't Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Hardware based GPS SCD Systems All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Page 6 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001 phpBB Group
phpBB port v2.1 based on Tom Nitzschner's phpbb2.0.6 upgraded to phpBB 2.0.4 standalone was developed and tested by:
ArtificialIntel, ChatServ, mikem,
sixonetonoffun and Paul Laudanski (aka Zhen-Xjell).

Version 2.1 by Nuke Cops 2003 http://www.nukecops.com

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
19.121 (01 Dec 21)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping