View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have a look at Gatso 706@30 this appeared for a VERY short period in the PGPSW database (I remember requesting deletion of said camera) and somehow it is still in the TomTom database, strange fact is there has never been a Gatso or mobile speed camera at this location - figure it out!!! - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15137 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Darren wrote: | Ah no, that is funny |
and entirely expected... right?!
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Robin2 Lifetime Member
Joined: Nov 24, 2003 Posts: 1441 Location: Swansea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
You ought to seed a couple of phony ones in the PGPSW database and, when they appear in the TomTom offering, sue them. It's a disgrace that a company as wealthy as TomTom will not pay royalties on a database that, it is alleged, they have stolen
Robin _________________ TomTom One v3 Europe, Navcore 7.903, Western Europe 835.2420
TomTom Go 720 Europe, Navcore 8.351, Western Europe 855.2884
Satmap Active 10
Plus a lot of other PDA GPS kit, seldom used |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whoa, we're not alleging any such thing! We couldn't afford to! I merely suggested it was an amazing feat for them to have gathered all the information they did in such a short space of time.
However, it's clear they don't have use any of our data anymore (if they did before of course!) as their database is so woefully inaccurate! _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Darren wrote: | I merely suggested it was an amazing feat for them to have gathered all the information they did in such a short space of time. |
You'd have thought that while they were visiting all those cameras, they could have re-surveyed some of the mapping errors at the same time!
THAT seems to take YEARS to get round to... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | Also, is it still the case that Monitron cameras all come up with what I assume is the MOBILE alert symbol (a camera on a tripod) as you pass them? That's what I get for all the ones near me!
Shoddy... |
Hmmm. I get a speed limit sign for a Gatso (most times), except I sometimes get a symbol resembling a Gatso pole and offset camera. I get a tripod for Redlights, except sometimes I get a speed sign for a Redlight. I think!
But I can affirm that today they at last have their equivalent of Gatso:666@40 showing 40mph (and not a Gatso symbol) - it always used to be at 50 on earlier maps. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|