View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevest220 Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Dover
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:52 pm Post subject: FAT32 or NTFS |
|
|
I will soon be buying a new ds card for my RAC SatNav 100 so that I have bigger memory and can download speedcam database and more poi's. The current sd card is FAT32 format, should I format me new card as FAT32, or will it operate better formated as NTFS?
Tks
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tonys66 Lifetime Member

Joined: May 25, 2006 Posts: 510 Location: norfolk
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would say leave it the same |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kartracer Frequent Visitor

Joined: 26/03/2003 20:15:33 Posts: 502 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Leave it as it comes. If you do want to reformat it then use Panasonic SDFormatter, a free download. _________________ Kam |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevest220 Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Dover
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:20 pm Post subject: tks |
|
|
tks for the info
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tanda Lifetime Member
![]()
Joined: Aug 21, 2005 Posts: 617 Location: Gloucester UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you are going to get a new, bigger SD card, get a "FAST READ", or whatever its called. When I bought my bigger card, I bought a normal one, and when the speed camera icons are displayed, and the alerts are on, the sat nav runs slow, it says "TAKE THE NEXT TURNING ON THE RIGHT", JUST AS i HAVE GONE PAST THE TURNING, so I have to turn the icons off and just have the audible alerts on. When I get round to it, I will copy my SD card again onto a faster card. _________________ Audi A3 Sline sat nav |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aj2052 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Jul 03, 2005 Posts: 1431 Location: Leics,UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I always thought memory cards had to be formatted at fat16, I have just checked the properties of my sd and the memory card just shows Fat wereas a second hdd i have shows Fat32 correctly, I have not seen any different information and I am quite happy to be corrected if neccesary |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kartracer Frequent Visitor

Joined: 26/03/2003 20:15:33 Posts: 502 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
It doesn't matter whether you use FAT16 or FAT32 on an SD card. What may matter, depending upon how you use the card, is the cluster size. A few years ago when using TomTom 3 on an iPaq I found that larger cluster sizes dramatically improved the performance of the application. To-day, with more, larger and faster SD cards, I either format a card in the device in which it will be used, or use SDFormatter which formats it according to agreed SD card standards. _________________ Kam |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
philpugh Lifetime Member

Joined: Dec 28, 2005 Posts: 2003 Location: Antrobus, Cheshire
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tanda wrote: | If you are going to get a new, bigger SD card, get a "FAST READ", or whatever its called. When I bought my bigger card, I bought a normal one, and when the speed camera icons are displayed, and the alerts are on, the sat nav runs slow, it says "TAKE THE NEXT TURNING ON THE RIGHT", JUST AS i HAVE GONE PAST THE TURNING, so I have to turn the icons off and just have the audible alerts on. When I get round to it, I will copy my SD card again onto a faster card. |
You may end up being slightly disappointed. The 'high speed' cards are generally high speed for writing, which is not required for this sort of application. The read speed may well be faster than the early cards but not by a huge factor. Most PDA's (and all-in-one satnav systems) have an internal transfer rate below what most cards can support. What you are probably seeing is the affect of having a large number of POIs visible - along with the proximity detection. This takes quite a bit of processing power. _________________ Phil |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
aj2052 Frequent Visitor

Joined: Jul 03, 2005 Posts: 1431 Location: Leics,UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After doing quick search on internet, It would appear that some cards may not accept Fat32 some will. and from a personal experience I upgraded from a standard 2gb to a unknown x133 2gb card on my Mio168 and did find it was better and slightly quicker specifically it stopped Sharon Stuttering, perhaps reducing POIs may have helped also who knows, Probably case of "you pays your money then see" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nomadros Occasional Visitor

Joined: Feb 22, 2007 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: Re: FAT32 or NTFS |
|
|
stevest220 wrote: | I will soon be buying a new ds card for my RAC SatNav 100 so that I have bigger memory and can download speedcam database and more poi's. The current sd card is FAT32 format, should I format me new card as FAT32, or will it operate better formated as NTFS?
Tks
Steve |
NTFS is only really for file security on your drive (card), so unless you have your card networked 8O FAT'll be fine. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevest220 Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Dover
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:45 pm Post subject: Once again tks |
|
|
Once again
Tks for all you help
I think I will get a 2gb card with a speed of x133. I will carefully choose my poi's that are shown on the map/alerts.
I will use the spare space to download some mp3's as the unit is capab;e of playing them.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kartracer Frequent Visitor

Joined: 26/03/2003 20:15:33 Posts: 502 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
kartracer wrote: | A few years ago when using TomTom 3 on an iPaq I found that larger cluster sizes dramatically improved the performance of the application. |
Correction! I just got suspicious about my own memory, so I searched the old messages. It was actually TT2 and, contrary to expectations, the smaller cluster sizes gave quicker performance. YMMV. _________________ Kam |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MaxRider Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jan 28, 2007 Posts: 15 Location: Consett County Durham
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I bought a sandisk extreme 3 card from my memory and it loads visibly quicker than the tom tom stock card. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevest220 Occasional Visitor

Joined: Jan 02, 2007 Posts: 32 Location: Dover
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:21 pm Post subject: sd card |
|
|
The Sandisk is one of the cards I have looked at, think that's what I'll buy when I find a good price - must check 'pricerunner'. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|