Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
SurfShark VPN
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Fastest vs shortest on Garmin i3
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Fastest vs shortest on Garmin i3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Garmin Portable Navigation Devices
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Skippy
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12
Posts: 2946
Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

noddy wrote:
Whats baffling me is why the algorithym should want to take me so far out of my way on a route that is over 3 minutes longer and tell me it is the "fastest" but when I put in a different destination but an identical route (apart from the extra 2 miles) it then calculates it correctly.


Only Garmin knows the answer to this question but quite a few suggestions have been put forward and I think they are a fair summary of what's going on when you get odd routes.

1. In an effort to strike a balance between a fast route calculation and a good route, the Gamin doesn't do an exhaustive search of every possible route to your destination. Depending on a number of factors, it may choose a route which is 10% longer than the actual fastest or shortest route. Some Garmin models acutally allow you to choose one of several options between Best Route and Quckest Calculation. The i3 seems to have a hard coded compromise which you can't change.

2. Some roads are not coded correctly by Navteq who supply the maps to Garmin. This causes the Garmin units to occasionally route down a single track country lane when a "B" road runs parallel to it.


If it really bugs you then try this experiment. Drive the route 10 times at different times of the day and use a stopwatch to time how long it takes. Now try driving the alternative route 10 times and see how long that takes.

Compare the times and the deviation from the mean time taken. I'm sure you will find that it can change by several minutes depending on a number of factors. If the time taken to drive the route varies by 5 minutes then the +/- 3 minute variation in the time that the Garmin gives as it's ESTIMATED time of arrival is neither here nor there.

If you are still not convinced, then switch the Garmin off and try driving to a destination you haven't been to before with your missus reading the map and see how long that takes. Wink

My Garmin works, it has it's quirks and it's routes are not perfect but it's 100 times easier to use than a paper map. And the wife loves it. That's good enough for me!
_________________
Gone fishing!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Almahadeus
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 06, 2005
Posts: 346

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skippy wrote:
noddy wrote:
Whats baffling me is why the algorithym should want to take me so far out of my way on a route that is over 3 minutes longer and tell me it is the "fastest" but when I put in a different destination but an identical route (apart from the extra 2 miles) it then calculates it correctly.

If you are still not convinced, then switch the Garmin off and try driving to a destination you haven't been to before with your missus reading the map and see how long that takes. Wink


Well said Skippy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ride4smilesjonny
Regular Visitor


Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Posts: 222
Location: teesside

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With you 100% skip!
_________________
**********************************
Hi ho - Hi ho its off to Arran i go,
with my i3 and a cup of tea hi ho, hi ho
hi ho hi ho.....
**********************************
www.ride4smiles.co.uk

£3500 raised in two weeks! :-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
TomDavison
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 384
Location: Bedford, England

PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Skippy wrote:


If you are still not convinced, then switch the Garmin off and try driving to a destination you haven't been to before with your missus reading the map and see how long that takes. Wink


Don't forget to ask for the estimated time of arrival (to within a few seconds would probably be acceptable), and for regular updates on any variation to the previously calculated arrival time. And if you do ignore her instructions remind her that "turn around when possible" is much more acceptable than vitriol and a smack round the head with a road map.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slartibartfast
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just got my v8 maps back (nine days and I phoned Garmin on the eighth day) and I thought I would try a route which had produced unusual routes using v7. The result was that a route from Ware in Hertfordshire to Nottingham on both shortest and fastest was 130 miles (v7 and v8 ). The RAC
routeplanner finds a a shortest route of 106 miles. That's a difference of almost 20%. Has anybody elese found a discrepancy as large as this.
At least it's nice to have the new A120 and A10 bypass on the new maps so any routes to suffolk don't take you on 50 miles of back roads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
slartibartfast
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my last post I stated that fastest and shortest routes were exactly the same from Ware to Nottingham. I have since tried a route from Ware station to Nottingham and the shortest route is 107 miles which agrees well with the RAC website. Ware station is only 50 yards from the location I tried the original route from and in fact the "longer" shortest route takes me past the station. The fastest route in both cases follows the A1 to the M25 and the M1 rather that take the M10. Adding a via at the M10 reduce the distance by 7 miles and the time by 9 minutes. I thought that maybe "faster" might mean higher average speed for the journey but in this case the average speed using the M10 was 59.04mph and the A1/M25/M1 averaged 58.65mph.

PS How do you produce those white quote boxes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
005clive
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 65
Location: Penryn, Cornwall

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

slartibartfast wrote:

PS How do you produce those white quote boxes?


In the top right hand of a post you will see a quote box - click it will do the rest
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
slartibartfast
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: 33

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 8:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

005clive wrote
Quote:
In the top right hand of a post you will see a quote box - click it will do the rest
.
Thanks 005clive. Having javascript turned off in firefox didn't help either. Turned it on , now it works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> Garmin Portable Navigation Devices All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.052 (08 May 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping