Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Globalsat BT-338 review
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Globalsat BT-338 review
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> GPS Receivers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SteveRogers
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2005
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My Globalsat GPS Bluetooth BT-318 came with no documentation, just a car charger..no box even. As it is to be used in a plane (higher than 12 volts DC) I needed to charge from house supply (240 volt AC in Australia)main so chose a 12 volt 1amp DC power supply (such as run toys, etc) as the car charger presumed to run on 12 volt DC as that is what the power socket delivers. Guy in electrical shop set polarity (as is reversible). Later found that GPS, according to Internet, has battery that is 5v!
Now dead. Supplier says my fault.
Has anyone else had a similar experience or been supplied without documentation?
Any ideas on a workaround?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EasyD2
Regular Visitor


Joined: Aug 13, 2004
Posts: 137

PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think your main problem is not the lack of documentation but rather that you didn't get a mains charger with the device.

We ship the BT318 with car charger and mains charger which is the standard.

You really should have had a mains charger in the package.. .unless of course the mains charger wasn't included in the reseller's price.

Always make sure you know what's in the package when something looks too cheap.
_________________
www.easydevices.co.uk

Tel: 0871 7000 156
Globalsat UK Distributor
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
AlanK
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 17, 2005
Posts: 248
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Need to buy a new GPS and its either one of these of the new TT MkII

Having used the TT I liked the size of it but as I posed on the main forum can anyone actually compare the two as its hard to tell from the pics here.

I assume that they will both work the same (time etc)

Cheers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
iankb
Frequent Visitor


Joined: May 09, 2005
Posts: 283
Location: Reading, UK

PostPosted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I used a Rikaline 6030 GPS with CoPilot on an iPaq and had loads of problems with it. It could take 10 minutes to get its first fix, and sometimes never. It didn't like having no external aerial, and seemed to be very choosy about when it would accept a Bluetooth connection. I could waste 5 minutes at the start of each trip, rebooting the iPaq, etc, until I got a guaranteed Bluetooth connection.

I threw out the Rikaline and bought a BT338. I now have 100% reliability, with very fast connection, and more satellites used that can handle overhead trees, etc. I have never been happier with a purchase.

Having only had two GPS units, I can't say whether this a recommendation for the Globalsat, or a warning against the Rikaline. But you can't argue with 100% reliability.

I don't know what the TT uses, but I think that the reason that the Globalsat is so much better is its use of the Sirf III chipset. It is a major improvement.
_________________
Ian

iPaq 2210
Globalsat BT-338
Seidio G2500 Amplified Vent Mount
CoPilot 6, GPS Tuner 4.2, Navio 3.01
BMW 330ci Sport
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ckenway
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2005 10:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lbendlin wrote:
The documentation for the SiRF III chipset mentions SBAS. However the BT-338 rejects any SiRF commands to set the SBAS source. Ergo - while SBAS is possible, it's not implemented in the current firmware.

On the bright side this receiver is good enough to not actually need SBAS.


I am interested in this and the Holux GR236 and can't quite make up my mind. They both are suppose to be SBAS compliant although talking GlobalSat they tell me that the original firmware of the BT338 did not actually support SBAS and that only shipments from late August work in this mode. What I want to know is has anyone ever got one to work? I see from the review of the GR236 that they couldn't get that to work either, any thoughts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lbendlin
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59
Posts: 11878
Location: Massachusetts, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The firmware 3.1.1 is now supporting SBAS. I'll have to place my BT-338 in a favorable position (facing south) and check if it gets a differential fix.

Anyhow you shouldn't base your purchasing decision on that - SBAS is useless for street navigation.
_________________
Lutz

Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ckenway
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lbendlin wrote:
Anyhow you shouldn't base your purchasing decision on that - SBAS is useless for street navigation.


Why?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lbendlin
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59
Posts: 11878
Location: Massachusetts, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because you are driving all the time, and cannot position the receiver to point south (where the SBAS sats are) while driving.

SBAS only makes sense for clear sky view (planes for example) or for stationary geolocation (geocaching etc)
_________________
Lutz

Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ckenway
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hang on a minute this does not make sense. If what you said about pointing south is true then that means aircraft can only travel north to south or south to north or does somebody go and turn the arial round depending which direct they want to fly?

The way I understand it is there RIMS (Range and Integraty Monitoring Stations) that are at fixed locations around Europe, in fact there are 34 of them. They then send the signals to MCC's (Master Control Centres) that calculate the error and then uploaded to the EGNOS sats that then broadcast it. So all that is broadcast is the actual error and nothing else. Without the GPS satellites nothing would work. This will then give a garanteed error of only 2M. If I have misunderstood or got any of this wrong then please correct me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iankb
Frequent Visitor


Joined: May 09, 2005
Posts: 283
Location: Reading, UK

PostPosted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not the ability to point south that's important. It's the ability to see satellites to the south that is important. As your car turns, you are likely to lose satellites to the south and gain ones to the north. The direction of the aerial, and it's placement within the car, means that you are unlikely to be able to see all GPS satellites at the same time. Also, because the EGNOS satellites are relatively low in the sky, they are far more likely to be obscured by buildings, etc.

You may be able to see EGNOS satellites for part of the time, but you may well lose that ability while you are driving for long periods in the 'wrong' direction, and in between buildings. What's the point of using it if you can't depend on it.
_________________
Ian

iPaq 2210
Globalsat BT-338
Seidio G2500 Amplified Vent Mount
CoPilot 6, GPS Tuner 4.2, Navio 3.01
BMW 330ci Sport
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ckenway
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually the more I ask questions the more I answer them myself by looking through the web. What you have just said is utter and total rubbish, I would strongly recommend that you look at http://www.esa.int/esaNA/index.html and http://www.essp.be/ before you start making these comments. My question has been answered in as much as I will buy a receiver that works with this system and if anyone wants accuracy I would recommend that they do the same. The more I read the more I realise that some people here just don't know what they are talking about when it comes to state of the art technology.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lbendlin
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59
Posts: 11878
Location: Massachusetts, USA

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ckenway wrote:
The more I read the more I realise that some people here just don't know what they are talking about when it comes to state of the art technology.


self critique is the first step to improvements.
_________________
Lutz

Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
iankb
Frequent Visitor


Joined: May 09, 2005
Posts: 283
Location: Reading, UK

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ckenway wrote:
... I will buy a receiver that works with this system and if anyone wants accuracy I would recommend that they do the same.
If you can find one. Also, I've never ever been notified that I'm travelling on the wrong road, so why would I need this so-called better (and, to me, erratically-enabled) accuracy?
_________________
Ian

iPaq 2210
Globalsat BT-338
Seidio G2500 Amplified Vent Mount
CoPilot 6, GPS Tuner 4.2, Navio 3.01
BMW 330ci Sport
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ckenway
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 30, 2005
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 9:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

iankb wrote:
ckenway wrote:
... I will buy a receiver that works with this system and if anyone wants accuracy I would recommend that they do the same.
If you can find one. Also, I've never ever been notified that I'm travelling on the wrong road, so why would I need this so-called better (and, to me, erratically-enabled) accuracy?


Well these people have reviewed at least two products that are capable of working.

You have assumed that people only want to use GPS for driving on roads, many also want to use them for walking and to be up to 20M out half way up a mountain could create a problem. This system will be approved in 2007 for use in the European aircraft industry. I would imagine that if what you have said is true then we will have planes landing everywhere other than at airfields and crashing all over the place.

As for the quality of the reviews well look at the review ratings system and I quote

"Pocket PC GPS Hardware

For the Hardware Rating below, we add up each of the 4 items and divide by the maximum they can achieve which is 40. So we take 8+9+0+9/40=64%

Rating

Durability
Windscreen Suction Mount Strength
Air Vent Mount Strength Not Supplied
Car Power Cable Quality

Overall Rating 65%

The the guy uses it for a day and gives it a rating of not less that 95 althoug in most cases it's 96,97,98. Well it does rather speak for it's self as another forum member has pointed out in another thread (I think it was in the Foruna thread). I got the impression that if he (a global statement) switchs it on and it gets him to the office then it's bloody good kit and worth a high ranking. Ask a reviewer to make a choice between two products and it's well yes, may be, possibly followed by buy that it's cheaper as if cheaper means it's a better bit of kit. I don't suppose they want to upset the manufactures otherwise they will have to go out and actually buy stuff.

So for anyone wanting to know about EGNOS go and have a look at the website URL's I posted a couple of posts back, it will tell you all you want to know and its factual, not made up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nfh
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Oct 06, 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Portugal

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does this unit feature an external antena connector, as the Holux 236?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> GPS Receivers All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.044 (24 Apr 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping