View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Skippy.
And we are getting all out of proportion here. The original was about FOUR cameras on Dartford bridge, yet we seem to be having enormous palpitations. Four out of how many which give no trouble at all (and indeed, if those four warn for the ACTUAL speed limit as indicated by JaTe, quite properly not giving trouble either)?
The addition of the odd camera at school sites with short term speed limits is red herring too. Again, not many, in my opinion and so what anyway? How long (distance) does a school speed limit last? Variable speed cameras category should, in my opinion, be reserved for those cameras which are accompanied by recognisable signage - I'm talking here about the M25 and M42 with gurt big gantries full of signs which display the limits at the same time as you get the variable speed warning, NOT somewhere where there may be a mobile in the middle of a school zone after you've already passed the temporary 20 zone sign.
Inforad is a specialist thingy and I do feel that their users should take up with Inforad that there are SOME cameras which the Inforad system gets wrong.
Unlike TomTom and Garmin, Inforad have seen the wisdom of using the PGPSW database, no doubt based on the respective accuracy reputations. The OEM systems which use directional and average zone capabilities just don't cut the mustard with accuracy.
I have TomTom devices which for their own data are purported to use both directional and average zone capability. But they're simply unreliable for my data.
Please let's not start suggesting sledgehammers for nuts. I'd guess about 99.9% of us have some "issue" or "challenge" with cameras but in my case, directional and average zone is trifling so long as the camera sites are recorded accurately. PGPSW suits my needs, none of the others do. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15144 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, to keep this all in context can someone answer the following:
1) are these cameras physically present
2) do they say 'not in use' on them
3) what is the normal speed limit for that road
4) what is the current (reduced?) speed limit for that road
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SteveMPS Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 30, 2010 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That was (effectively) the status when I last drove over it on Friday. I haven't seen the "Cameras Not in Use" signs for a while but couldn't assert they're not there and the gantries are there for cameras but could not confirm if they were populated or dummy boxes or nowt).
Will be Wednesday before I next drive over it, will re check
(Sod's law says they will have read this thread and rushed out and reinstalled them ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15144 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if there are no 'not in use' signs then my opinion is that they should be in the database. whether they are empty or not is a different matter, there is nothing for us to work on other than a 'not in use' sign.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MaFt wrote: | if there are no 'not in use' signs then my opinion is that they should be in the database |
But it seems there are standard camera signs....
(smaller, without the text, but I couldn't find one of those)
..... BUT with that grey paint stuff over them, which would imply the same thing, wouldn't it?
Someone has specifically done something to suggest they are not in use. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doh! Four pages of discussion about four camera warnings which somebody doesn't want but which warn about a 50mph speed limit on a road which is subject to a 50mph speed limit. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SteveMPS wrote: | Skippy wrote: | . . .
That sounds like a design deficiency in the speed camera warning unit rather than a problem with the database... |
If I was Mr/Ms InfoRad I'd say it was t'other way round. From their point of view they have bought a licence to the database in good faith and implemented a valid algorithm that sounds the alert if the actual speed exceeds the reference speed. Why should they have to do different? |
Fair point!
I presume it has an OFF switch though. _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SteveMPS Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 30, 2010 Posts: 57
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yes Skippy it has an off switch and it gets used on that bridge. It stays off past the junction with the A2 as there's a false variable entry there and it stays off down through the A21 as there's a wrong 60mph entry there for a 70 limit. The off switch also gets used through the SW M25 Variable areas from the A3 to the M4.
Not sure anyone buys an SCD to keep it switched off though . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15144 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
SteveMPS wrote: | Oh yes Skippy it has an off switch and it gets used on that bridge. It stays off past the junction with the A2 as there's a false variable entry there |
i'd take this up with inforad. there are no cameras here in our database. there is a mobile site further on on teh A225 but this should be ignored due to it's directional date. there WAS a specs camera in the vicinity but this was 50mph, not variable, and was removed in september 2008...
SteveMPS wrote: | and it stays off down through the A21 as there's a wrong 60mph entry there for a 70 limit. |
again, i see no cameras on the A21 (farnborough area) other than some redlights but these appear to be in a 40mph stretch.
SteveMPS wrote: | The off switch also gets used through the SW M25 Variable areas from the A3 to the M4. |
why's that then? cos you get warned of the variable speed cameras? again, feel free to contact inforad to see if they can amend their software with regards to how it deals with the variable speed cameras.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spook51 Lifetime Member
Joined: Mar 26, 2004 Posts: 548 Location: East Midlands
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
SteveMPS wrote: | Not sure anyone buys an SCD to keep it switched off though . |
Maybe they should add a "mute" button. I know from years of driving with RADAR detectors that they are essential but I guess a SCD doesn't produce anywhere near as many false alarms. Still, it might be a nice feature! _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JaTe wrote: | I came up from J31 out of the MSA and did not see any signs, but re the cameras, they were there at 03.00 this morning - you have to look at the top of the gantries and the cameras sit on both ends facing the four lanes. They also have i/r lamps attached.
And hand on heart - Yes they are yellow - even at 3 in the morning. |
I hope you didn't drive hazardously? _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JaTe wrote: | You mean legally don't you |
Well, you tell me.
According to some schools of thought, it's legal to drive it at 70mph because the cameras are not in use and it's hazardous to drive at less than 50mph.
According to other schools of thought, it's illegal to drive at 50.miniscule fraction mph and hazardous too because the speed limit is 50mph.
You pays your money and takes your choice :-
You can have (like me) several hundred pounds worth of gear stretching all across the dashboard/windscreen coupled with twenty pounds a year's worth of speed camera database fully configurable. And a rucsac to carry them off in when you park!
Or you can buy a £40 device which fits conveniently in your pocket with enough space for a bag of toffees as well and has free camera updates for life, but also has a few annoying features like earsplitting long-lasting warnings with no volume control and little or no configuration capability (according to some users reviews).
Seems like you can't have your cake and eat it. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can almost hear SteveMPS saying 'Take That, you bounders' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14892 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | I can almost hear SteveMPS saying 'Take That, you bounders' |
Well if it hadn't crossed his mind, I expect it will now. All it needs next is another email to Highways Agency to confirm it's OK to drive across at 70mph. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|