Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Two cameras shown where only one exists
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Two cameras shown where only one exists
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> PocketGPSWorld Speed Camera Database
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
willmow
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 9:56 am    Post subject: Two cameras shown where only one exists Reply with quote

I've recently submitted corrections to three (well-known) sites where the PGPSW map incorrectly shows two cameras where, actually, one reversible camera exists. Am I right to do this - after all, the map correctly shows other sites as having a reversible camera, so should this principle not apply throughout the system?

And do I get a life membership for my efforts? Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is deliberate. If the reversible cam is on a dual carriageway, TomTom will sometimes not alert if the reversible cam is shown on the 'other' track, so its 'mate' is included 'on the oither carriageway' so that it will alert.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
willmow
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, ok. And I though I was being clever Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14892
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

willmow wrote:
Oh, ok. And I though I was being clever Crying or Very sad

You were being clever. Please don't be discouraged, we'd much rather have reports than none. Hopefully next time you'll fare better.
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andy_P
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Posts: 19991
Location: West and Southwest London

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
This is deliberate. If the reversible cam is on a dual carriageway, TomTom will sometimes not alert if the reversible cam is shown on the 'other' track,


Personally, I reckon this issue is historical (with TomToms at least) and doesn't occur any more, as I always seem to get alerts for normal cameras on the other carriageway these days. I think they increased the "acceptance angle" or something).

However, I've never suggested getting rid of the "duplicates" as 1. it might be a lot of work for MaFt, and 2. I'd be bound to be proved wrong straight after!

The one thing my tidy mind would like to see is that where these "duplicates" exist for only this technical reason, then they shouldn't have totally different ID numbers.
I reckon they should be called something like "Gatso:12345 and "Gatso:12345a", so people might realise they aren't actually two discrete cameras.

Again I haven't dared mention it to MaFt so far... Laughing
_________________
"Settling in nicely" ;-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
willmow
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting.

Dare I say, I'm a bit discombobulated by the fog you experts appear to live in (again, I mean that in the nicest possible way.... Wink). If even you disagree as to what is fact (directionality, TomTom issues et al) than what hope have we poor foot soldiers?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andy_P
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Posts: 19991
Location: West and Southwest London

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry... we anoraks do tend to get a bit carried away!

The simple answer is...
We used to add ONE camera location in the middle of the dual carriageway, but people sometimes found they didn't get alerts for them when travelling in one direction or the other.
(presumably this was due to the slight variations of positioning on different brands and different maps).
Re-doing just those problem cameras with TWO markers, one on each carriageway, was a quick and easy "fix".
_________________
"Settling in nicely" ;-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14892
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There certainly is a lorra lorra fog about!

First, it's not really of concern to you if TomTom alerts directionally or not, because you have a Garmin, so that's a bit off topic anyway.

Second, all us "experts" are merely longer experienced users just like you.

Third, Andy is certainly using a different TomTom device from mine and there are differences between them (he's on much more recent firmware than two of mine) and I also use an iPhone running the iOS version of the database.

Fourth, I have a TomTom device which alerts for everything under the sun (pgpsw database), irrespective of direction.

Fifth, I have another TT device which allegedly alerts only for directional TomTom (not pgpsw) camera records, but I have on several occasions been warned by it both ways, or from after I've passed one (making me think it's warniing for reflections!).

Sorry soldier, you got it right about us being at odds with one another, so you don't have a snowball's chance in hell!!!

There is a difference between Garmin and TomTom (and probably others) maps. Don't ask me why - I think it's because GPS coordinates can only give a limited accuracy (5 metres?). But one set of coordinates results in a camera in a layby on a TomTom, but off to the side (5 metres into a field) on a Garmin. To overcome that problem, we try to position our coordinates in the middle of the carriageway so that we get it right for either device. In some cases, this results in a camera being warned for both directions.

One system which gets it right directionally every time is the PGPSW CamerAlert version running on my iPhone.

Maybe to clear the fog - if you get a warning, react as if there's a camera there and you won't be far wrong!! If you can't see a camera, feel free to submit a removal request. And KEEP TAKING THE TABLETS. Laughing Laughing Laughing
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
willmow
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tablets taken. Am now lying down in a darkened room. Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andy_P wrote:
I reckon they should be called something like "Gatso:12345 and "Gatso:12345a", so people might realise they aren't actually two discrete cameras.
I suspect that MaFt's database uses a long integer as the record number for a camera. If the database is set up as such, there is no way that you can have alpha characters in a numeric field.

Andy_P wrote:
Again I haven't dared mention it to MaFt so far... Laughing
I've got a sneaky suspicion that you have already done that a couple of years ago. Last post here for one Very Happy
@ willmow. For goodness sake don't come out of your darkened room for a while Very Happy and then report all the cams you find missing Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15143
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
Andy_P wrote:
I reckon they should be called something like "Gatso:12345 and "Gatso:12345a", so people might realise they aren't actually two discrete cameras.
I suspect that MaFt's database uses a long integer as the record number for a camera. If the database is set up as such, there is no way that you can have alpha characters in a numeric field.


Give the man the clap. Yup, Andy has already mentioned it and yup we use long integer in the back-end database so cannot have alphabetical characters in them. also, the camera ID's are 'auto-increment' meaning each new addition in the database automagically increases by '1' from the previous one so we cannot 'force' any numbers without messing things up. the numbers also auto-increment for every sighting, correction and remove etc so 2 new cameras may not have following numbers if there were other submissions in between them etc.

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
willmow
Regular Visitor


Joined: Mar 14, 2010
Posts: 167

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Give the man the clap


Blimey, you're deviants as well........ Surprised
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

willmow wrote:
Quote:
Give the man the clap
Blimey, you're deviants as well........ Surprised
LIKE!. No. It's quite OK, we have a clinic quite near me. Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andy_P
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Posts: 19991
Location: West and Southwest London

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:

Andy_P wrote:
Again I haven't dared mention it to MaFt so far... Laughing
I've got a sneaky suspicion that you have already done that a couple of years ago.


Correction....
"I haven't dared mention it to MaFt AGAIN... " Cool

OK... how about we get rid of all the doubles and see if anyone complains?

Is there even a way that you can pick them out, MaFt?
_________________
"Settling in nicely" ;-)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kremmen
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Mar 03, 2006
Posts: 7043
Location: Reading

PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A bit cumbersome but I have an option to remove 'duplicate' cameras. I did it to remove the ones on motorways where they are on the same gantries but opposite carriageways:

Unfortunately the HTML checker won't let me post the code Sad
_________________
Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> PocketGPSWorld Speed Camera Database All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.052 (08 May 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping