View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
spikeyboy Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 31, 2004 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 6:24 pm Post subject: SGR Receiver and Tom Tom 3 |
|
|
Just received my 2500 mount and wired SGR 300 reciever - just gave it a test drive, but am a little disappointed as Tom Tom 3 is very late on my positions, im like always 200 (10 secs) ahead of the positions Tom Tom is saying i am.
Running on a Ipaq 2210, currently have Tom Tom 3 and the Map installed on CF - thinking this may be the problem with slow updates to my position.
Anyone else had this know how to fix it.
What setting should i select in Tom Tom GPS for the SGR 300 receiever as im thinking this may also be the problem.
Thanks
Spike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Set the receiver to NMEA standard 4800 on port COM1 . Using SiRF protocol sometimes results in a lag. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spikeyboy Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jul 31, 2004 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks will give that a try - id had tried NMEA 4800 and it dod work but didnt try when moving, then i had tried SiRF 4800 and that worked as well so i left it as SiRF 4800
Spike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maxbyk Occasional Visitor
Joined: Aug 06, 2004 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 2:40 pm Post subject: SGR Receiver and Tom Tom 3 |
|
|
Spike,
Did you solve your issue? Would you recommend I buy that receiver? Right now Seidio has a very nice promotion on the Mount/GPRS bundle for an iPAQ. Thanks a lot! I will not be buying until I hear that this issue is not widespread.
Max |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|