View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alwyn1 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Feb 04, 2006 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: Defrag |
|
|
I've noticed that when my 920 is plugged into the PC and I check the C drive to see how fragmented it is( after a session of removing stuff) the 920 shows up as well as the C drive.
I've refrained from running defrag on the 920 but would it hurt it if I did? Or even would it defrag? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dhn Frequent Visitor
Joined: Oct 08, 2007 Posts: 2544 Location: Toronto CANADA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do not believe you gain anything trying to defrag flash memory. Would not bother ... _________________ David |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bensonboo Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 18, 2008 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I won't claim it speeded it up, but I have defragged my OneXL a couple of times and it certainly didn't do any harm. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
falkirk81 Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Jul 07, 2006 Posts: 1649 Location: Newcastle, England, UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why wouldn't you gain anything by defragmenting flash memory? I defrag my 520 weekly. Surely the info is read sequentially, thus fragmentation may occur? Doesn't do any harm anyway, and the amount of correction data i add, and the updating of POI`s means i do get fragmentation.
If you don't believe me, do an analysis of the flash drive. Mine regularly shows up with files split into pieces over the 520. _________________ Tomtom GO 1005 LIVE
iPhone 12 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mullet Frequent Visitor
Joined: Dec 12, 2005 Posts: 1051
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The speed gained by defragging a hard disk is achieved by sorting the stored data so that the mechanical actuator arm spends less time travelling across the disk platters to access data from different areas.
Since flash does not have any mechanical parts, defragging will yield minimal speed benefits. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Consensus is that this is bad for flash memory because it has a finite read/write life cycle. Defraging involves a lot of writing and so by doing so you are reducing its working life.
Also, flash memory is not accessed by a single read/write head as a hard disk drive is and so the need for files to be contiguous is not relevant here. Any speed improvement that would result from having all files located contiguously would be immeasurably small. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
carl_the_cobbler Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 22, 2007 Posts: 251
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
That is exactly the same as what they say on Techworld.com in a 2005 article.
Defragging makes no real sense for a Flash Drive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
carl_the_cobbler wrote: | That is exactly the same as what they say on Techworld.com in a 2005 article. |
Spooky, I've just looked that up and I didn't crib from it earlier! _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|