View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
davethepitch Occasional Visitor
Joined: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 50 Location: Stoke on Trent
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: Which one to choose |
|
|
Please can anyone help
I am in the process of purchasing a bluetooth gps reciever but not sure which to go for out of these two
Holux GPSlim236 Wireless GPS receiver
or the
Tomtom gps reciever
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what were your selection criteria so far? _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
davethepitch Occasional Visitor
Joined: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 50 Location: Stoke on Trent
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:53 pm Post subject: which to choose |
|
|
I have an Ipaq 2210 at the moment running tomtom 5 and i have borrowed a sysonchip Cf gps antenna but i am considering going to bluetooth but i am not sure whether to go for a Holux GPSlim236 Wireless GPS receiver (SiRF Star III) or go for a TomTom Bluetooth GPS (SiRF Star III) which are the best or are they just as goos as each other.
Thanks Dave[/b] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
davethepitch Occasional Visitor
Joined: Aug 02, 2005 Posts: 50 Location: Stoke on Trent
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry it should have read just as good as each other |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2006 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Holux has a slightly longer battery life (and a replaceable battery), the TomTom looks nicer but doesn't have a replaceable battery.
I'd say go with the Holux. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|