View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mow Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 09, 2005 Posts: 112 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:48 pm Post subject: Version 5 advanced warnings |
|
|
I know this topic has been mentioned before, but I have lost the thread in amongst the new topics posted recently/
I have certainly noticed a difference in the frequency of double instructions in version 5. Today I was instructed to "turn left and then turn left" with the second turn some 250 yards away and many side roads between. I must admit I do find this somewhat confusing - to me turn left and then turn left should apply to an immediate next instruction. Without looking at the map (and lets face it is not always possible) one could easily be hesitating when driving expecting to turn immediately.
Does anybody know what Tom Tom have done to the programming and why ?
Appologies if this have been previously answered. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calypso Occasional Visitor
Joined: Oct 07, 2004 Posts: 18 Location: Geneva, Switzerland
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mow Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 09, 2005 Posts: 112 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John:-
Thanks for the link ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmwman Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 26, 2005 Posts: 73 Location: Solihull, UK
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mow,
If you haven't already done so, it's worth logging on to the TomTom website, creating a My Account, and asking the question. The more people that challenge the design the greater the chance of a a fix.
Regards,
Rich |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gingernut777 Frequent Visitor
Joined: Nov 03, 2004 Posts: 251 Location: Earth where else
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
bmwman wrote: | The more people that challenge the design the greater the chance of a a fix.
Regards,
Rich |
Why do we need a fix, i find the double warning a useful addition. _________________ Using an A to Z
Sextant & Compass |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldboy Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Dec 08, 2004 Posts: 10641 Location: Suffolk, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have no problem with the double warning. It makes me aware that another another change of direction is close by.
'Left and then left' to me means 'turn left and get ready to turn left again. I'll tell you when'. A quick glance at the TTG would confirm this. _________________ Richard
TT 910 V7.903: Europe Map v1045
TT Via 135 App 12.075: Europe Map v1120 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mow Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 09, 2005 Posts: 112 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
May be it's being used to the older version, but to me turn right and then turn right would indicate some immediacy in the instruction. To find other right turns that should be ignored between instructions tends to be misleading. To me its simply the wording - if it was to state turn right and then in 250 yards turn right I would have no problem.
All this said I will continue to support a superb product and all these debates and opinions will hopefully make it even better in the future. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MikeB Frequent Visitor
Joined: 20/08/2002 11:51:57 Posts: 3859 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lutz has reported the same issue in the US. Here it is far more pronounced. Telling you about the next turn which is miles down the road rather than in a couple of hundred yards.
Personally I like this feature, especially if you have to turn left and then right as you may need to get over a lane or two to perform the right turn. _________________ Mike Barrett |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HOG Regular Visitor
Joined: Apr 15, 2005 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have had two incorrect instructions which have been bloody dangerous and could hae caused an accident with V5.
It has told me on dual carriageways to take a left to get to my destination only to find it has directed me into a disused dirt track with no possibliity of turning round. Result? I have had to TWICE reverse out onto a dual carriageway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mow Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 09, 2005 Posts: 112 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HOG wrote: | I have had two incorrect instructions which have been bloody dangerous and could hae caused an accident with V5.
It has told me on dual carriageways to take a left to get to my destination only to find it has directed me into a disused dirt track with no possibliity of turning round. Result? I have had to TWICE reverse out onto a dual carriageway. |
HOG:-
I have had the same occurance leading me to back an HGV out of a closed road where a new stretch had been constructed, the shortest route would have been down the old road if it was still there ! - I put it down to the use of old maps and await the delivery of the new updates. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmwman Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 26, 2005 Posts: 73 Location: Solihull, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My suggestion directly to TomTom has been similar to Mow's - if the distance between the two turnings is greater than (say) 200 yards the messages should change from "Turn left then turn right" to "Turn left then after xxx yards turn right".
Running the TTG on the motorbike means that I rely very heavily on the spoken instructions and the capacity to keep looking down onto the screen is not viable.
Regards,
Rich |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jdatkinson Regular Visitor
Joined: Oct 29, 2004 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've only had v5 up and running for a few days, and this change in the voice prompts slightly unnerved me at first. Like using a TTG when you've never used satnav before (which was me in September), I just think it takes a bit of time to get to the unit's turn of phrase. The voice engines and maps on these things will never be perfect, so i'll continue to "overrule" the TTG if my own eyes and the road signs suggest that to be the best option. At the risk of incurring a light flaming, if you think it almost caused an accident, then you are probably relying on it too much. Just my 2p.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnBoy59 Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 21, 2005 Posts: 120
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But it was ok before!! _________________ Life's a bitch... then I met Jane... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Zuke Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 29, 2004 Posts: 123 Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To be fair to TomTom, there was a minor problem with limited warnings on motorway-type junctions at speed. I agree with MikeB that the new instruction logic is generally an improvement under these conditions, but becomes fatally flawed in low speed congested urban situations.
I tried v5 again today, and in the centre of a small town I was not familiar with, the voice instructions took me into a Safeway car park. Since this was located by a complex one way system, the voice instructions became so verbose and superimposed that they were counterproductive in recovering the journey. Peering at the map display was just not possible while negotiating the junctions.
As JohnBoy59 points out, it was ok before. Nice try, TomTom, but no cigar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mow Regular Visitor
Joined: Mar 09, 2005 Posts: 112 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBoy59 wrote: | But it was ok before!! |
I totally agree, it seemed fine to me before, however I guess this debate could go on for ever, and each opinion is as valid as the next.
How about a compromise based on your current road position i.e. double instruction on motorways around 250 yards (or even more) A roads 150 yards and B roads 50 yards. May be asking too much of the product, may be me getting too much of a perfectionist, but may be worthy of debate ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|