View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mars.1 Lifetime Member
Joined: Apr 27, 2006 Posts: 133
|
Posted: Thu Nov 09, 2006 4:04 pm Post subject: Cameras that need to be deleted. |
|
|
I have got 4 cameras that need deleting.I have already submited these but its hard work trying to get them deleted. I have got two on m1 and two on the a406. The two on the m1 are id-16546 and 17224[specs].The two on the a406 are id-4892 and 17537[gatsos].It would be usefull if these good be updated for the next database release.Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swing Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Nov 04, 2003 Posts: 2225 Location: Bedfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What's "hard work" about getting them deleted, and how could it be improved? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neil01 Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 06, 2005 Posts: 902 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All that is needed is for another helpful member to check out your deletions and submit them also.
Unfortunately, they are not in an area I normally travel, so I will not be able to help this time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
swing wrote: | What's "hard work" about getting them deleted, and how could it be improved? |
The "hard work" is that sometimes it takes months for changes to be applied (if ever), and it could be improved by having a section of the database or a section of the forum specially for submissions that need confirmation from another member. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
neil01 Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 06, 2005 Posts: 902 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds reasonable to me - perhaps this would result in more of the unknown speed, and deleted cameras being brought up-to-date.
One area which is starting to concern me is the mobile cameras. I have a suspion that there are too many duplicates, along with many locations which are no longer used. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cichlas Occasional Visitor
Joined: May 14, 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
I noticed on the last update that I downloaded, not sure on the latest one, that some mobile camera sites have been deleted (A31 hogsback). They were still using those sites lastweek. What is the criteria for mobiles to be removed? You can go for a month without seeing them there and then they are back every other day. Seems that the deletion is to early for mobile sites?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swing Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Nov 04, 2003 Posts: 2225 Location: Bedfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 - Ah, I understand your problem now. I personally think things are improving in the speed of removing cameras, although I base this mainly on how quickly temporary roadwork speed cameras are removed.
As for mobile camera site, I don't even report these for deletion. As I've said before on these forums, years ago I reported some hardstandings that were put in by the local council for use by the speed camera vans - out of 3 I have only ever seen one in use (and that was only a few months ago), but that doesn't stop them existing and being used next month or next year. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ianyam Occasional Visitor
Joined: Oct 21, 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:21 am Post subject: Mobile units |
|
|
Could it be that the police use the same info to look into which mobile units are deleted and then replace the mobile units there. or if their usual spots are listed here not use them?
Just a thought, they must use these files and info for their own means, they would stupid not to. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swing Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Nov 04, 2003 Posts: 2225 Location: Bedfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe some Police forces actually use this database to help prevent speeding "incidents", but I think you are looking for a conspiracy theory that isn't there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15155 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 2:19 am Post subject: Re: Cameras that need to be deleted. |
|
|
mars.1 wrote: | I have got 4 cameras that need deleting.I have already submited these but its hard work trying to get them deleted. I have got two on m1 and two on the a406. The two on the m1 are id-16546 and 17224[specs].The two on the a406 are id-4892 and 17537[gatsos].It would be usefull if these good be updated for the next database release.Thanks. |
update:
specs 16546: awaiting confirmation
specs 17224: awaiting confirmation
gatso 4892: awaiting confirmation
gatso 17537: awaiting confirmation
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So we're back to the question.... why can't there be a section of the database or the forum where people can go to specifically check these submissions and get them verified quicker...please?
I can't see how it would compromise the verification or free life membership processes; but if it would, tell us and I'll stop banging on about it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Scarecrow Lifetime Member
Joined: Jun 09, 2006 Posts: 185 Location: Kent
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I too have submitted cameras for deletion, to find that they are still in the next release (haven't checked current database). Cameras I submitted for deletion were set up in roadworks on the M2 to monitor the temporarily imposed 50 mph limit. Roadworks were completed some time ago, and speed now back at NSL, so there is no reason for the cameras to remain on the database. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennisN Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006 Posts: 14893 Location: Keynsham
|
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2006 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | So we're back to the question.... why can't there be a section of the database or the forum where people can go to specifically check these submissions and get them verified quicker...please?
I can't see how it would compromise the verification or free life membership processes; but if it would, tell us and I'll stop banging on about it! |
Here, Here! Bis! Encore!
And so on and so forth. PLEASE do me a CSV file for unconfirmed stuff and I'll confirm everything I pass - whitevanman from Bristol area to North, South, East and West. PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE. _________________ Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andy-c1 Lifetime Member
Joined: Feb 05, 2005 Posts: 1039 Location: East Sussex
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
ever since we have moved over to this verification of sites i have seen a dramatic decrease in the relability of camera ,can't we go back to how it used to be or at lest just only confirm moved additions or deleted cameras , i am often going passed cameras that are not there ,most times i manage to catch them but a lot of the time i'm passed them before i can get the location
thanks _________________ TomTom 5001 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
swing Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: Nov 04, 2003 Posts: 2225 Location: Bedfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:42 am Post subject: Re: Cameras that need to be deleted. |
|
|
MaFt wrote: | specs 16546: awaiting confirmation
specs 17224: awaiting confirmation | Shame I didn't see this yesterday - I drove that section of the M1 twice. I do remember thinking there were a couple of cameras on the South bound side that weren't any use as the cars were now too many lanes away from the camera, but I wasn't paying enough attention to confirm these deletions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|