GATSOs with no lines on the road surface

sussamb · Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:07 pm Post subject:

Don't think so, that's ACPO guidance ...
_________________
Where there's a will ... there's a way.

M8TJT · Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:38 pm Post subject:

And I suspect that the 10% +2 is a numeric representation of "Give them a bit of leeway as we don't want to look really stupid by fining people for exceeding the speed limit by one mile per hour."

Kremmen · Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:49 pm Post subject:

I find it sad when some drivers try to work out and put into practice how fast can they go and avoid prosecution.
_________________
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3

M8TJT · Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:48 pm Post subject:

You mean probably avoid prosecution. 10% + 2 is only a guideline.

jjmurphy · Occasional Visitor Joined: Sep 23, 2009 Posts: 43

M8TJT · Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:33 pm Post subject:

There is a remove request for 3519, possibly somebody 'knows' it's just there for show. The policy, as I understand it, is to leave a defunct camera in the database as this avoids getting multiple re-submissions for it.

Presumably the boxes for 3519 and 13782 are still there?

Try a drive past 483 at about 60, and if you get a NIP, please let us know that it is live. (Do you feel lucky, punk? Well, do ya) Laughing

@ MaFt. If jjmurphy confirms 3519 box is still there, that would make pRemove 188372 redundant?

Kremmen · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:29 am Post subject:

The later Monitron cameras are all active as far as I know. No reason for them not to be. Whether they need to flash in daylight I have no idea.

I've also no idea whether they need white lines to prove speeding.
_________________
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3

MaFt · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:48 am Post subject:

jjmurphy · Occasional Visitor Joined: Sep 23, 2009 Posts: 43

M8TJT · Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:16 pm Post subject:

Thanks. Hopefully MaFt will pick this up

MaFt · Posted: Tue Mar 06, 2018 2:47 pm Post subject:

	PocketGPS
	Web