View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alan_sh Lifetime Member

Joined: Aug 25, 2005 Posts: 545 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:58 pm Post subject: Timings |
|
|
Now that I have to use an SDHC card for the full WE maps, I thought I'd do some quick timings to see whether the card was faster than internal memory.
So, on internal memory, I loaded Europe West. On an SD card, I loaded the full WE maps. I had two cards - one was an 8gb SDHC class 4 device, the other was a 4gb SD card (very rare).
Put the SD card in, switched on the device (TT Go 730) and selected the full maps. Did a route from my house (Rochdale) to Cambridge. It took about 80 seconds.
Cancelled the route. Switched off the device. Put the SDHC card in - did the same route. Took about 75 seconds.
Cancelled the route. Removed all cards and switched it back on. Did the same route again. It took just over 30 seconds.
So, this proves to me that the internal memory is much faster than and SDHC card and that is what you should be using if at all possible.
Hope this helps
Alan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MrT Frequent Visitor

Joined: Nov 14, 2003 Posts: 2146 Location: Surrounded by A1, M1 & M25
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Do you think that having the partial map on the internal memory may be causing this? I wonder as on much older versions of TT (on a PDA) I used to have over time a regional map, UK map, UK & Major Roads of Europe and Western Europe and the smaller maps always performed much quicker that the larger. _________________ Drivelux |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alan_sh Lifetime Member

Joined: Aug 25, 2005 Posts: 545 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not that much smaller.
Alan |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
matthewj Frequent Visitor

Joined: Apr 03, 2006 Posts: 751
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You need to consider the "class" of SD card you have when looking into this. Apparently the higher the class number, the faster the memory access is, but also the more expensive it is. Some cameras require class 6 for example to be able to record video, as lower classes cannot sustain the writing speed. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MrT Frequent Visitor

Joined: Nov 14, 2003 Posts: 2146 Location: Surrounded by A1, M1 & M25
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is also a case of how fast the TT can read and write, it would be pointless buying a class 6 card if the TT could only write at class 4 speeds. Has anyone any idea of the TT's capabilities here? _________________ Drivelux |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mpwilson99 Lifetime Member

Joined: Jun 30, 2007 Posts: 462 Location: Hickstead, Sussex
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
35 seconds on the PDA with class 2 16gb SHDC. _________________ TomTom 700 GO user since Dec 2005.
TomTom PDA XDA user since Dec 2007.
TomTom HTC HD2 user since Jul 2012. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Border_Collie Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Feb 01, 2006 Posts: 2543 Location: Rainham, Kent. England.
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Obviously the software also makes a difference.
Mio P350 - iGO 8.0 - Full Teleatlas E and W Europe mapping - 2GB SD Card x150 (approx 19x speed) - Fastest Route Rochdale to Cambridge - 8 seconds. _________________ Formerly known as Lost_Property
And NO that's NOT me in the Avatar. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AliOnHols Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Oct 15, 2008 Posts: 1942
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Although I've never thought to do the test I as you have I must say that the results surprise me. The only difference between Internal Memory and SDHC card I have noticed is when I am transferring data between the PC and SatNav or the memory card in a reader. The transfer rate to SatNav is in kB and to the Memory card is in MB.
Is there any chance that the TT has a cache memory and that it has remembered the route from the previous two calculations and has just pulled the route from it's memory? _________________ Garmin Nuvi 2599
Android with CamerAlert, OsmAnd+, Waze & TT Europe.
TomTom GO 730, GO 930, GO 940 & Rider2.
SatMap Active 10 & 20. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alan_sh Lifetime Member

Joined: Aug 25, 2005 Posts: 545 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think so - but I can repeat it next time I'm playing. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
andy-c1 Lifetime Member

Joined: Feb 05, 2005 Posts: 1039 Location: East Sussex
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can agree with that as I thought putting maps on a sd card would make things faster , a few before the map update I put the maps back onto teh internal drive and there was a remarkable difference in speed _________________ TomTom 5001 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Robin2 Lifetime Member

Joined: Nov 24, 2003 Posts: 1441 Location: Swansea
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 720 with the full Western Europe map and Navcore 8.351 on a 4GB SDHC card (not a Class 6) and the Western zone map and Navcore 8.351 on the internal memory. With the card in, it calculates Rochdale to Cambridge in 45 seconds. Removing the card and using the smaller map and application on the internal memory, it takes just over 35 seconds.
In real life I can't see any difference between them
Robin _________________ TomTom One v3 Europe, Navcore 7.903, Western Europe 835.2420
TomTom Go 720 Europe, Navcore 8.351, Western Europe 855.2884
Satmap Active 10
Plus a lot of other PDA GPS kit, seldom used |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lost_Property wrote: | Obviously the software also makes a difference.
Mio P350 - iGO 8.0 - Full Teleatlas E and W Europe mapping - 2GB SD Card x150 (approx 19x speed) - Fastest Route Rochdale to Cambridge - 8 seconds. | Ancient Mio C710. iGO8. All running from SD. Same route = 8 seconds. John o' Groats - Land's End = 17 seconds. Who would have a TT then 45 seconds? I'd get bored waiting. Ha Ha  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Border_Collie Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Feb 01, 2006 Posts: 2543 Location: Rainham, Kent. England.
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John o' Groats - Land's End = 17 seconds. Yep, same here.
Quote: | Who would have a TT then? |
Been there, done that. No thanks.
As I said earlier, Quote: | Obviously the software also makes a difference. |
London - Rome 48 secs.
Now for the wrath of TT owners.  _________________ Formerly known as Lost_Property
And NO that's NOT me in the Avatar. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lost_Property wrote: | M8TJT wrote: | Who would have a TT then? |
Been there, done that. No thanks. | By some quirk of fate, I have missed out on that doubtfull pleasure I also can't get too excited over the fact that I can't update my maps 101 times a year  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | Who would have a TT then 45 seconds? I'd get bored waiting. Ha Ha  |
Lost_Property wrote: |
Now for the wrath of TT owners.  |
Why?
Hows this?
Lands End to John o'Groats - 5 seconds
or
London to Dublin - 7 seconds
Yes, it's a TomTom.... Watch this space? 
Last edited by Andy_P on Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|