View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Bosun Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 473 Location: Wakefield,West Riding of Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: Screen Visibility |
|
|
Went for a walk today using my Garmin 60CS with Topo UK mapping as my Active 10 is in for warranty repair.I haven't used the Garmin for walking for a while preferring the Satmap and I must admit I really missed the OS mapping.
One thing that struck me though was how easy it was to see the Garmin's screen even in direct sunlight without any form of backlighting.The one gripe I have with the Satmap is the difficulty in viewing the screen in direct sunlight,or even not so direct sunlight at times.
When using it on the bike I have to have the backlight at or close to 100% permanently to see anything at all ( and no I don't think it is my eyes ).Of course this also has a bearing on battery life.
I wonder what the difference is in the technology in the Garmin screen compared with that of the Satmap ?
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
axys Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 01, 2009 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had my Satmap on my bike on Sunday, which was sunny, and the screen was nigh on impossible to read, even when I stopped and shrouded it with my hand. As a new user, it’s the first time I've used it on the bike on a fine day - I was disappointed to say the least. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike777 Regular Visitor
Joined: Feb 12, 2009 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
axys wrote: | I had my Satmap on my bike on Sunday, which was sunny, and the screen was nigh on impossible to read, even when I stopped and shrouded it with my hand. As a new user, it’s the first time I've used it on the bike on a fine day - I was disappointed to say the least. |
Sorry if this is a stuipd question but did you have the screen brightness set to 100 %
Reagrds
Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
janerik Occasional Visitor
Joined: Aug 17, 2009 Posts: 3 Location: Drammen-Norway
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is my point too. My old Magellan XL do is much better in sunlight allso.
I took of the replaceable cover thing and put on a coverprotection sheet instead and got a nice improvement in visibility |
|
Back to top |
|
|
axys Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 01, 2009 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike777 wrote: | axys wrote: | I had my Satmap on my bike on Sunday, which was sunny, and the screen was nigh on impossible to read, even when I stopped and shrouded it with my hand. As a new user, it’s the first time I've used it on the bike on a fine day - I was disappointed to say the least. |
Sorry if this is a stuipd question but did you have the screen brightness set to 100 %
Mike |
It was set at 80% and I was using the boost button to 100%. There's not much shade on a top of a mountain and on a handlebar the Satmap is facing upwards and I don't expect a perfect rendering but its not summer - ambient light levels are reducing. I had to take the outer screen off which did improve matters, but it's a poor solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bosun Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 473 Location: Wakefield,West Riding of Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
janerik wrote: |
I took of the replaceable cover thing and put on a coverprotection sheet instead and got a nice improvement in visibility |
Yes I too have removed the top cover and use a screen protector and whilst there is a slight improvement in visibility it still leaves a lot to be desired in bright light.
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
johnjackson Occasional Visitor
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use mine on the bike all the time. It can be difficult to see in bright sunlight. I found the following helps:-
1. Tilt the bike mount so the unt is about 30 degrees nose up. This allows you to look at the screen at a right angle in your normal ride position. Viewing the screen at an angle is poor in sunlight.
2. I always use 100% brightness with screen off after 30 seconds. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ocam Occasional Visitor
Joined: Nov 08, 2007 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've never actually not been able to see the screen; even in bright sunlight you can see it clearly enough to use it well enough. Move your head slightly, varying the angle allows you to use the transreflective effect or whatever it's called.
(Besides, how many bright sunlit days do we get in the summer these days?)
Anyway, the times you most want clearest visibility is in poor light conditions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigPerk Frequent Visitor
Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
No doubt everyone knows this but Satmap's reply today, FWIW was Quote: | We suggest to try the following:
* In very bright sunlight it is possible to see the screen better by turning it slightly so that the reflective foil in the back of the screen gets used to most effect.
* Also - if the screen cover is very scratched - it will be more difficult to see through: you can try removing it and using the unit without a screen cover - or better still - with a Zagg protector. | Glad if it IS of any help! _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AllyCat Frequent Visitor
Joined: Feb 23, 2005 Posts: 376 Location: Catford, London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:41 pm Post subject: Re: Screen Visibility |
|
|
Bosun wrote: |
I wonder what the difference is in the technology in the Garmin screen compared with that of the Satmap ?
|
Hi,
Yes, that's a question I've never found a definitive answer to. It seems to differentiate most handheld GPSs from PDA-type devices. The touchscreen layer on most PDAs might be a contributing factor and I wonder if the Satmap uses such a screen even if that part is not actually used. However, I suspect the reasons are as follows:
Most PDAs have screens to display "pictures" with 65k colours whereas the mentioned handheld GPSs only display 256 or fewer colours. I suspect the screen or drive electronics can be optimised for better daylight visibilty.
The OS map colours have been chosen for clarity when printed on paper and may be not ideal for a LCD colourscreen in transreflective mode. Since the maps (on the models of GPS mentioned here) are vector-based, Garmin can optimise the actual colours to suit the screen visibility. The "graphics" nature of a vector map is also likely to be clearer than a map in "raster" form.
Certainly the two extra reflective layers of the front protective screen can't help the Satmap. A Zagg screen protector is well worth considering. Being installed when moist, they're much easier to position and to avoid bubbles than other screen protectors (the main difficulty I have is getting them off their backing sheet at the start). They're not particularly cheap, but don't be put off from ordering on their USA website as they're shipped from the UK (and every one comes with a $5 discount voucher).
Chers, Alan. _________________ Garmin GPS72H/76/60/45, Etrex H, Mapsource v6.5.
Acer N50,HP114,Loox N560,Dell x50,CF/SD cards to 4/32GB.
RoyalTek,Holux236,Navman B10 & Copilot(Globalsat) BT GPS,TomTom5/6.
Memory Map (v5.4.2 & v5.1.3 OS & Euro), GPS gate,OSGPSconverter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
axys Occasional Visitor
Joined: Sep 01, 2009 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found the Zagg screen protector very difficult to apply, and even though I'm usually pretty good at such things, annoyingly ended up with 6 bubbles. Wasn't too worried because the instructions said they would go in a couple of days . The last 3 took 2 weeks. Mine (from Satmap) wasn't moist - it had a strong adhesive backing - you only got one shot at it. It was very shiny which didn't help at all with reflections. It seemed very tough but better suited to helicopter blades than Satmap screens (oh, and a ridiculous price for what it was). It went back with the Satmap when that was returned for a refund, and I wouldn't use a Zagg (or a Satmap) again. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only Zagg shields I have fitted have been supplied with a spray applicator which contains a soapy fluid that you spray on to either the device or adhesive side of the screen protector, this lets you "float" the clear protector in to position before using the supplied squeegy to get rid of any surplus fluid - 100% result every time, although the iPhone Zagg shield is a heck of a fiddly contraption to get right! - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bosun Frequent Visitor
Joined: May 02, 2005 Posts: 473 Location: Wakefield,West Riding of Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikealder wrote: | The only Zagg shields I have fitted have been supplied with a spray applicator which contains a soapy fluid that you spray on to either the device or adhesive side of the screen protector, this lets you "float" the clear protector in to position before using the supplied squeegy to get rid of any surplus fluid - 100% result every time, although the iPhone Zagg shield is a heck of a fiddly contraption to get right! - Mike |
Same here Mike,no adhesive as such.
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Chris32 Occasional Visitor
Joined: Jan 03, 2006 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have Zagg protectors on several devices, including cameras and a pda and I have never had any real problem in applying them following the instructions given.
I took the outer cover off my Satmap and put on a Zagg protector and it has worked well for me, in heavy rain on mountaintops and during an amazing week of bright sunshine in the Lakes in September.
However my only use is when walking - I have no experience of using it on a cycle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|