View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Brad Occasional Visitor

Joined: May 31, 2004 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 8:22 pm Post subject: Fortuna Versus Haicom |
|
|
After much deliberation, I have settled on using TomTom N3 with an ipaq 4150.
My problem is deciding between the BT receiver. Fortuna (BT clip-on) looks good, as does the Haicom (CF 303E / 303mmf with BT slipper), if a little cumbersome. However the Hiacom seems to be more expensive.
Does anyone have any experience of using both / either of these products. If so which would you recommend?
Thanks
Brad |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
UHF Regular Visitor

Joined: Mar 27, 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Vandenberg AFB, Ca, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2004 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ONly clipon (CO) exp here. It is very good. I use the 2215 and CO. The CO gives me very quick fix when cold, about 15 seconds. When warm, it almost instant. The 8.5 hours of batery is also nice. There is a good chance the CO will have Xtrack V2 available for download also. CO is small and comes with a belt clip for walking. In the XT mode I get a 5 satellite fix in my house away from windows. In ST today I was getting a 10 satellites in view, tracking 10 satellites and using 9 for calculations with the WAAS signal also being recieved. I consistanly get 12-14 feet accruacy without WAAS. I have found no issues or flaws with it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DavidW Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 17/05/2003 02:26:21 Posts: 3747 Location: Bedfordshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2004 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've got a Haicom HI-303MMF, and no Bluetooth slipper. Frankly, if you're wanting a Bluetooth GPS, the Clip On is a better buy. It's probably cheaper than all the Haicom kit, and it has the bonus of being switchable to Xtrac mode.
David |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|