View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LOSTwGPS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Dec 16, 2006 Posts: 6
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LOSTwGPS Occasional Visitor

Joined: Dec 16, 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:13 am Post subject: A Little Advice |
|
|
Hello,
The review does cover the version as sold on Ebay. I missed the new 32 channel listed on the chart in the review. And it is in a bright red font, I apologize.
For car, plane, sightseeing, and hiking it seems my best choices are the 32 ch solar or the quality of the BT-359s. I would appreciate any feedback. I am relatively new to GPSs, I have a Garmin 195 and a very short lived, I think dead i360. So, I will count my next one as my first GPS.
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lbendlin Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: 02/11/2002 22:41:59 Posts: 11878 Location: Massachusetts, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only place where you may need 32 channels is in urban canyons. Everywhere else 12 channels are more than enough.
The solar BT receiver comes with either SiRF III or Nemerix chipset. If you want performance, take the SiRF III version. If you want a bit more battery life, take the Nemerix. _________________ Lutz
Report Map Errors here:
TomTom/TeleAtlas NAVTEQ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|