View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mikeact Frequent Visitor
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 303 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: A new camera category ? |
|
|
I see from The Times today, that Gatso are/have introduced a new camera add on that will take a front view of you as well...apparently to stop those caught saying that it was somebody else. Would/does this mean that we should see a new 'category' of camera in the database ? Seems like a good idea to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's just a standard Gatso site with an additional forward facing camera accompanying it (though why they don't just use forward facing Gatso's like the rest of Europe) so I don't see a need for an additional category? _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mikeact Frequent Visitor
Joined: Nov 29, 2004 Posts: 303 Location: West Sussex
|
Posted: Wed May 24, 2006 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Might be nice to warned to 'smile' for the camera....or for the more dubious of you...'don't try and play hard to get if you get caught with this device...better pay up'. I think it would be nice to know that they've got my picture with this Gatso...no messin'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andy_P Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jun 04, 2005 Posts: 19991 Location: West and Southwest London
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought they weren't supposed to use normal Gatso's forward-facing, because firing a high-power flash in your eyes while you are driving isn't terribly safe.
Has that changed? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | I thought they weren't supposed to use normal Gatso's forward-facing, because firing a high-power flash in your eyes while you are driving isn't terribly safe.
Has that changed? |
The second camera isn't a 'normal' Gatso and has a low intensity flash that allegedly does not blind the driver _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikealder Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jan 14, 2005 Posts: 19638 Location: Blackpool , Lancs
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have a read of yesterdays times newspaper, it covered these type of installations in good detail on the front cover, have a read on http://timesnews.typepad.com/news/ if you want the web version - Mike |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andy_P2002 wrote: | I thought they weren't supposed to use normal Gatso's forward-facing, because firing a high-power flash in your eyes while you are driving isn't terribly safe.
Has that changed? |
These new cameras have an invisible infra-red flash.
Existing Gatsos will flash at you as you are driving towards them, though I don't think they take a photo because by the time the second flash goes off the vehicle would be out of the picture. _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
biggy7 Occasional Visitor
Joined: May 20, 2004 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Sat May 27, 2006 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
why dont they just use Truvelo cams instead of making new ones? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An excellent question! _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
biggy7 wrote: | why dont they just use Truvelo cams instead of making new ones? |
Because that would mean the removal of the existing Gatso to be replaced with a Truvelo and they aren't going to just throw away their Gatso cash machines.
It's interesting that the Police are be putting in these extra cameras. They say it's so they can identify the driver so people can't say they didn't know who was driving.
I think the truth is more sinister and what is probably happening is that more and more people are simply denying that anyone was actually driving their car at the time of the offence.
The scamera partnership produce a photo of the back of a Ford Mondeo with your numberplate but that doesn't prove anything - the motorist simply insists that no one was driving their car at the time, implying that their number plate must have been cloned. This becomes a very, very difficult case to prove one way or another and it gets quietly dropped. _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gdavison Occasional Visitor
Joined: Oct 27, 2005 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
biggy7 wrote: | why dont they just use Truvelo cams instead of making new ones? |
Maybe they are starting with Gatso Swap outs .. The other week I noticed that the Gatso at the end of the Heston Services Slip road on the M4 heading East was gone :D .. Was going to email a database update.. Then on Friday morning I noticed in the central reservation a Monitron had appeared
Also look here
http://www.speedcam.co.uk/london.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|