View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
PaulW21781 Lifetime Member
Joined: May 19, 2006 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:53 am Post subject: Submitted a camera change, but made a slight mistake... |
|
|
Hi
I made a submission change to the POI database for the speed cameras, but made a slight mistake in the description (saying what camera in the location is valid as there was a few which were incorrect in close proximity), but I ended up saying one of the other cameras which I reported in an earlier correction was valid when its not...
Should I re-submit or wait until I hear anything back?
Cheers
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15156 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so, which one do i use?
[81016] There was never a camera here, the 2 cameras on this stretch are located under each bridge/crossing section.
[81650] There was never a camera here, possible duplicate submission of camera ID 81016. Note, 81016 IS correct.
[81651] Camera never existed, there were no roadworks on this stretch in the past 18 months. Possible confused submission over camera 80983 which IS correct.
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulW21781 Lifetime Member
Joined: May 19, 2006 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi MaFt
Ok... The 2 correct cameras are:
W-tGATSO:81089@50
E-tGATSO:80983@50
The ones which are incorrect are:
W-tGATSO:81016@50
E-tGATSO:81651@50
W-tGATSO:81650@50
The roadworks are up by 81089 and 80983 hence the 50 limit, and bot cameras are positioned under the 2 bridges crossing the A55. The camera at 81016 has never been in that position since the roadworks began, its always been at the position of 81089.
81650 and 81651 have not been in that position from what I remember for the past 18 months. There were roadworks around that location about 4 months ago, but they were East of J36 on the A55, and no temporary camera's were placed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15156 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ok, so all 3 remove requests are valid, it's just that the reference to 81016 being correct is actually wrong?
MaFt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulW21781 Lifetime Member
Joined: May 19, 2006 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MaFt wrote: | ok, so all 3 remove requests are valid, it's just that the reference to 81016 being correct is actually wrong?
MaFt |
Yes sorry, I got confused with the numbers a bit when I was writing the comments bit. I meant to put 81089 but put 81016 by mistake in the description bit.
81089 and 80983 are the only valid camera's on that stretch of the A55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MaFt Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005 Posts: 15156 Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks. i've now amended your submissions |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|