Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:16 pm Post subject: £87m a year from Speedcams but do they increase casualties?
Figures obtained through freedom of information requests by pressure groups the TaxPayers' Alliance and the Drivers' Alliance show the amount collected in UK speeding and red light offences caught on speed cameras in the financial period 2008-09 was £87,368,227.
This figure also includes fines from magistrates’ courts for speeding offences and neglect of traffic directions in 2008. "Neglect of traffic directions" offences caught on cameras often include red light and lane offences, though no breakdown is calculated by the Ministry of Justice or other authorities.
Top 10 areas with highest speeding fines caught on speed cameras in the UK are:
London - 2 police force areas (Metropolitan and City): £6,265,860
Avon and Somerset:3,491,340
Mid and South Wales - 3 police force areas (Gwent, Dyfed, Powys and S Wales): £2,915,340
Greater Manchester: £2,876,280
Thames Valley: £2,861,880
West Mercia: £2,795,340
Nottinghamshire: £2,380,980
Lancashire: £2,238,960
Hertfordshire: £2,168,280
Northumbria: £2,130,000
The report also says that casualty rates were dropping on Britain’s roads from 1979, but a slower rate of decline in road casualties has taken place since speed cameras were introduced in 1990. They claim that because the previous rate of reduction was not sustained this has led to over 1.5 million more casualties on UK roads between 1991 and 2007. _________________ Robert Brady
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:21 am Post subject: Fake statistics from the Drivers' Alliance
The Drivers' Alliance "claim that because the previous rate of reduction was not sustained this has led to over 1.5 million more casualties on UK roads between 1991 and 2007."
It is convenient that the graph illustrating their theory is only plotted up to 2007, as by about 2011 their analysis would indicate no casualties on UK roads! This report is based on completely fake science. Just ignore it.
Joined: Nov 18, 2005 Posts: 186 Location: St Neots, UK
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:21 am Post subject:
The fact that the accident trend reversed at the same time as cameras were introduced does not establish a causual effect - it may be coincidental.
Do you know the major cause of all accidents - eating. 99% of those involved in an accident ate something in the three hours before the accidernt. What better "proof" do you need than that? _________________ David
Joined: Feb 01, 2006 Posts: 2543 Location: Rainham, Kent. England.
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:31 pm Post subject:
And most accidents happen within 2 miles of your home...... So I moved. _________________ Formerly known as Lost_Property
And NO that's NOT me in the Avatar.
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!