Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Another Drive/Speed Article in the Daily Wail
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Another Drive/Speed Article in the Daily Wail

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
253
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 1058
Location: The green bit between the M40, M4 and M25.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:10 pm    Post subject: Another Drive/Speed Article in the Daily Wail Reply with quote

We've seen it all before, but anothefr article about speeding 10mph over the limit and you get no points/fine if you go on a course.

How many times does this have to do the rounds I wonder.

Link below for anyone who needs (cares) to read it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1372630/Drivers-exceed-speed-limit-10mph-escape-points-fines-brings-speed-cameras.html

Bob
_________________
Triumph Tbird 1700. And now a Bonnie T100.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
legalspeed
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 27, 2010
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:10 pm    Post subject: drive / speed article Reply with quote

I agree, this has been doing the rounds for a while now. Possibly the article in the Daily Wail was a rehash of old news, but it seems that all the media are carrying this story today (Sat, 9th April) as if it's going to happen. Even if it's true, I have a problem that perhaps other members might help with. As I see it, we live (supposedly) in a democracy with certain rules. First is that Parliament enacts legislation, ie what is the offence, and the sanction for it if found guilty. If Parliament does its job well, there should only be one interpretation of the legislation, and if there is any ambiguity, then it is down to the courts, not the police, to carry out an interpretation, or recommend that Parliament has another go if it turns out to be unenforceable. As I understand the situation the police are only there to enforce the law in its current interpretation. Nowhere have I seen anything that allows the police, (or possibly ACPO) to change or vary legislation passed by Parliament without reference from Parliament. As I understand it, the penalties for exceedind speed limits include everything from a fine to a ban etc. Nowhere have I seen anything about being able to avoid the legally laid down penalties for an offence by paying the police some money to go on a so called speed management / awareness course. Perhaps someone out there knows better, and that the police can initiate a procedure not sanctioned by Partliament,or could it be that the police themselves are in danger of possible lawbreaking? Regards, Legalspeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Swapping three points for £40 seems like a good deal to me. Very Happy Why hasn't someone tested the legality in court? Because they have just avoided the three points Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigPerk
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 06, 2006
Posts: 1618
Location: East Hertfordshire

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 12:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I haven't looked up this particular area so far, but although legalspeed seems to describe the main situation ok, it's not the whole story - if it was it would be even more bureaucratic to get changes in the law.

But there is also "secondary legislation", including such things as Statutory Instruments and other Orders, which provide delegated legislation powers to the Government (including individual Departments, such as the Home Office) to make changes to the law using powers conferred by an Act of Parliament.

That is probably where these courses come from, assuming that legalspeed is correct in saying that they are not already provided for in the main Act of Parliament or amendments.
_________________
David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skippy
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12
Posts: 2946
Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 7:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

M8TJT wrote:
Swapping three points for £40 seems like a good deal to me. Very Happy Why hasn't someone tested the legality in court? Because they have just avoided the three points Shocked


It's a great deal for the Scamera Partnerships too because this latest wheeze allows them to make a profit from speed cameras once again.
_________________
Gone fishing!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
M8TJT
The Other Tired Old Man
The Other Tired Old Man


Joined: Apr 04, 2006
Posts: 10118
Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Especially as they seem to have widened the speed gap within which you can get the course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
legalspeed
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 27, 2010
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 8:30 pm    Post subject: drive/speed article Reply with quote

As Big Perk says, (and the Daily Wail article mentions proposals only at this point) It could possibly be introduced under secondary legislation, and, as M8TJT says, rightly or wrongly, people will vote with their cheque books to avoid possibly a critical 3 extra points. However, I am still at a loss to understand how a penalty and fine decided under Parliamentary legislation can be completely avoided (the sanction for having committed the offence in the first place) by paying the police some money to attend a so called awareness course. The money from speeding fines goes into government coffers, and if this proceeds, then government will receive nothing, and the police everything. I spoke to a colleague, who some time ago, fell foul of the driving over the limit legislation. (He didn't allow enough time between his last drink at night and his first drive next day.) The result was an automatic ban and a fine. It was however possible for him to shorten the ban time somewhat by paying money and attending the relevant course. The fine still had to be paid, and most of the ban time served whereas (and I know that these are perhaps not the best of comparisons), it seems that in this speeding case proposal, the offender carries nothing but a financial penalty, (the cost of the police course), thus escaping the penalty that Parliament laid down for the offence.(the points). It smacks, if my distant school history lessons are remembered correctly of the middle ages Catholic church practice of selling indulgences for money so that your sins wouldn't appear on your record and so your immortal soul, (or today, your driving licence) would be protected. Regards Legalspeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Darren
Frequent Visitor


Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40
Posts: 23848
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Sun Apr 10, 2011 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You only get offered a speed awareness course if you fall within the guideline speeds, and the offence did not take place on a motorway (there are more criteria as well).

But, as I mentioned in last week's newsletter, the cost was in the region of £60-70 and it has now been agreed that this will rise to £100 to accompany the widening of the scheme criteria.

So this can only be seen as an alternative way to raise funds. An alternative route to funding cameras now that the Govt aren't subsiding them as much. And the rather murky dealings identified between ACPO and ANDISP (Association of National Driver Improvement Course Providers) raises further concerns. One thing is for certain, the ANDISP members will be making a profit out of this.

As the legal position of these courses, this FoI request on the matter makes interesting reading. In reality, police are granted discretion over whether to instigate proceedings but it's still a confused situation.
_________________
Darren Griffin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping