Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Driver slapped with £900 fine for following TomTom
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Driver slapped with £900 fine for following TomTom
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JimmyTheHand
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 16, 2005
Posts: 386

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if his delivery was in the village he might have at first thought it a track to where he was going. But if it was me, I'd have stopped and double checked and if not happy with the "route" would back out and phone
_________________
J.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JimmyTheHand
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Apr 16, 2005
Posts: 386

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

technik wrote:
You can't expect a BMW driver to have common sense.


You'll probably right - I am sure I had to deal with less idiots who think 2 metres adequate braking distance and feel their 1.2 Corsa and such like can make much better progress in traffic than my 200+ bhp car - since I got a BMW ;)
_________________
J.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Tired Old Man


Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14888
Location: Keynsham

PostPosted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, call me funny, but how can they do him for without due care and attention? Certainly he wasn't caring and attending, but he was effectively offroad and Darren's done stuff like that himself (in a more suitable vehicle) without being put up before the beaks. I would have thought the charges for the emergency/rescue services would have been enough punishment without also stinging him in court. Seems a waste of court resources to me. ('Course, if he'd been driving a black VW Golf I'd have locked him up for life!).
_________________
Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stanley_Tweedle
Regular Visitor


Joined: Jul 10, 2005
Posts: 207

PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's easy in retrospect to say he shouldn't have followed the track but it's easy to get confused if you don't know where you are going. Maybe he thought his destination might have been down a track? I can certainly remember visiting a business regularly some years ago that was down about 1/2 of a mile of barely drivable track.

I can think of a couple of times a sat nav has directed me down an unsuitable road. In one case I thought it was a handy local short cut to my destination and the surface wasn't bad; round a bend I soon came across a huge locked gate; which obviously the sat nav hadn't anticipated. Another time it tried to take me off an A road up a steep declassified track across some moorland, sensibly I didn't even attempt to follow.

For my money I think we should be expecting the road mapping and sat nav manufacturers to eliminate such tracks from the routes; at least for 4 wheel use. When sat nav was in it's infancy they had the excuse that there wouldn't have been time for them to have driven all the roads on the map to check them and also the user base was so small it wasn't worth investing money in checking maps. But the time has got to come when that is not good enough. In a way their customers are already checking the roads for them they just need to be more efficient in picking up on this data. Sort of Map Share/IQ Routes I suppose but they obviously haven't made best use of customer data yet. But is it unreasonable to expect the companies themselves to drive the roads too? Just setting your sat nav on shortest shouldn't lead you onto a dangerous track. Maybe they can have a setting for using verified roads only, then the off roaders and mountain bikers can turn it off if required.
Obviously until roads are classified properly driver mistakes are going to happen and it's only the serious ones we get to hear about; there are probably hundreds of minor incidents daily.

I know a good driver should check the routes on maps etc. but people don't always have time for that and people buy a sat nav on the hope that it will take the homework out of driving.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pjal
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Dec 23, 2006
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 10:37 am    Post subject: common sense Reply with quote

Confused What really concerns me as a road user, is that Mr Robert Jones is allowed to hold a driving license at all!......going by his theory that that his sat-nav told him to do it, does this mean then that when a green light shows at a pelican crossing or a set of traffic lights, Mr Jones will just carry on regardless and potentially run dow any pedestrians, or ram into any other vehicles....just because he had a green light?...... I suppose his defence then could be ..."well the traffic lights told me to go" !... but add to that this mans profession, as a Driver...and things take a turn for the really scary....?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Privateer
Pocket GPS Moderator
Pocket GPS Moderator


Joined: 30/12/2002 17:36:20
Posts: 4912
Location: Oxfordshire, England, UK

PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SatNav is and always will be a driver's aid, nothing more. As a driver you are responsible for the actions you take as well as safety of yourself, your passengers, and other road users.

However, if you are in an unfamiliar area then it's easy to see why people rely on their SatNav because that is what the thing is for. SatNavs are no longer the domain of geeks, SatNavs are now mainstream.

As long as the user has ensured that the maps on their SatNav unit are up to date (by buying the latest maps, or by buying a SatNav with the latest maps) then the user should be considered to have done everything as far as practicably possible. It should then become more the responsibility of:

1. The manufacturer of the SatNav and the provider of the maps for that particular SatNav (often the same company) to ensure that their products are accurate and safe to use on roads.

2. The authorities for ensuring that the roads are correctly signed as to their use as well as ensuring that all signs are kept visible by cutting back hedges etc.

Regards,
_________________
Robert.
iPhone 6s Plus, iOS 14.0.1: iOS CamerAlert v2.0.7
TomTom GO Mobile iOS 2.3.1; TomTom (UK & ROI and Europe) iOS apps v1.29
Garmin Camper 770 LMT-D
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
classy56
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 08, 2006
Posts: 441
Location: Dorset

PostPosted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm sure this guy is a very competent driver, on this occasion he was duped not only by his SatNav but by the local authority, by all accounts this track is marked as a road on all paper maps as well as his SatNav.

I have been caught once by SatNav, in the deepest darkest depths of Wales, it advised me to take the next left, I approached the turning, had a good luck and it looked a suitable road, in fact it was as wide as the M25, so down I went (this was in my coach), for two miles no problems, then the dreaded sign 'SINGLE TRACK ROAD WITH PASSING PLACES', there were two drivers on this job, so we stopped and discussed it, as it was 02.30am and we are used to single track roads in our native Dorset, we decided to push on, about another mile further on (0.5 miles from a main road and our pick up) there was a sharp left hand bend, so sharp it was a left turn rather than a bend, and yep we got wedged on the bend, it took us over an hour to get out of the lane after doing several thousand pounds worth of damage to the coach.

Our boss was not happy, I gave him an AA road map and asked him "which route would you have gone?", he chose the exact route we went.

So a bit unfair to blame the SatNav or even the driver, and to date, I have never gone through a green light and rammed any cars or humans for that matter Wink
_________________
Tomtom Go730T
App 8.300
Map v815.2003


To old to die young.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Barkley
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 17, 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i've seen this on a number of occasions - although not at Cliff edges. The best example is to search for Scotts Road in Glasgow. From the west heading east, it starts as a fully lit and tarred road, which changes to a farm track eventually ending at a farm gate. However the Council and OS continue to show the road continuing a further mile to the back of a housing estate - on maps it shows a viable route. I've already complained 3 times in 2 years to MavTeQ and the latest updates show it still in place.

Sure, the driver may have been foolish, but the major contributory factor in all this is would he have gone if the route had been correctly graded? The mnuacturers may assert they are not responsible for mapping inaccuracies, but where errors have been notified and the mapping STILL shows the error, just like council road defects, they take some of the blame. Blaming the driver 100% is neither fair nor reasonable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JockTamsonsBairn
Lifetime Member


Joined: Jan 10, 2004
Posts: 2777
Location: Bonnie Scotland (West Central)

PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Barkley wrote:
The best example is to search for Scotts Road in Glasgow.
Do you mean at 55.84055459581411, -4.397642612457275, in Paisley? That looks "entertaining"! You can see, on the overhead shot, that it's no more than a grass track from 55.839019895973905,-4.375533163547516!!
_________________
Jock

TomTom Go 940 LIVE (9.510, Europe v915.5074 on SD & 8.371, WCE v875.3613 on board)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsdinos
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: Jun 03, 2006
Posts: 119

PostPosted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems that Mr Jones tried to be a wise guy and get some money of the big satnav companies with lawsuits. Fortunately it happened in this country, which people have common sense and served him right.

I wouldnt be surprised if such a case would have been succesful in a US court! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
therobbos
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:29 am    Post subject: £900 Fine Reply with quote

Hi
I think that in this case, it was obvious that the guy had slavishly followed the Satnav and left his common sense in the boot or at home.

But where do you draw the line?

Sometimes a Satnav will point you down a road which does not seem an obvious route and you are left thinking "Is this some clever short cut or a software cock-up?"

If the road seems reasonable, you are going to follow it - else why have the assistance of satellite navigation - and if it is a path, you will ignore the direction, but somewhere in between is a very grey area.

How can the courts decide, and where does common sense and "driving without due care and attention" meet and cross the fine line.

In the case of the Beemer driver, it was an obvious decision, but if these cases start going to court on a regular basis, it could get very messy.

Still made me laugh though when I saw it on the local news!

Steve
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping