Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Is this the thin end of the wedge.
While it is nearly impossible to average 30 MPH anywhere in Taunton during the daytime, evenings are a different thing.
It is but a short step from ‘recording’ vehicle movement to sending out those little 60UKP letters!
Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 11:59 am Post subject:
Interesting - certainly looks a bit suspect - it must cost quite a lot of money buying/leasing and installing cameras, and presumably the software to gather the data to log the cars and work out time savings, if they are not linking to another system. Surely cheaper to have a few men/women/students standing by with a clipboard and watch checking specific makes of vehicle (to lessen the workload). And how do they know anyway where A and B are, unless they have specific road improvements scheduled?
Personally, I'm in favour of Average Speed Cameras over spot speed ones, at least on motorways, as a consistently excessive speed seems more dangerous and inexcusabl than an occasional slip, and it shouldn't distract/panic drivers so much when they suddenly go past one. But I'm NOT in favour of subterfuge - but then local authorities sometimes seem to me to be even keener on a police state then central government is (cameras in wheely bins, fines if bin lids aren't completely shut, etc,etc).
Might be interesting to check the local council's (eg road management subcommittee) minutes, see if there's any clue there. _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360)
Joined: Jan 10, 2008 Posts: 56 Location: Telford, West Midlands
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 8:22 pm Post subject:
I understand why monitoring traffic flow rates using cameras raises the hackles of motorists, cameras on our roads have had an appalling press over the years. Neither does it help when the local rag introduces the arrival of this latest camera innovation as "menacing".
According to the council they are there to monitor traffic flow rates. Isn't improved traffic flow a legitimate improvement for a local council to study? And are we really saying that a few bods with clip boards can do as good a job as a tireless, weatherproof camera?
Come on, at least wait until you are bitten before crying "wolf".
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
Hi! We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
But as we’re losing ad-revenue from this then why not make a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!