Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
MacFixer, the iPhone, iPod, and iPad specialists
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - ALK and the SIlence of the Lambs
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

ALK and the SIlence of the Lambs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> CoPilot Live
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
topgazza
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:59 am    Post subject: ALK and the SIlence of the Lambs Reply with quote

With all the complaints, quries and wishlist growing by the hour I am amazed that ALK retain this silence. They have some severe problems with users dumping their product and throwing away £135. All voice their compliants on this, well read board, and definately influence potential buyers who presumably shoot off and buy TT3 or whatever. I have had few problems with CP5 but other have. Some will be their equipment/config/software but the consistent pattern of the complaints is a worry moving forward. At the very least I would expect them to announce something, anything even through Dave would be a step in the right direction that they are doing something. Working on an upgrade to address some of the main issues, free of course as patches and upgrades are a tacit (and legal) admission that the product is not fit for purpose. This is the same in any software release anywhere else of course. What ARE they doing at the moment?

I hope they are not developing some whizzy new feature for the "Live" function rather than fixing the many issues with CP5 . If they announce CP6 at "only" £99 for the upgrade I will not be impressed. As I said, I have very little problems with CP5 but even I am getting cheesed off by the silence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gripp
Regular Visitor


Joined: Oct 06, 2004
Posts: 178
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How well you reflect my own feelings - and I suspect those of many other users!

I paid "extra" to get CoPilot (instead of my original plan to get TomTom), and get increasingly frustrated by it's inability to announce POI's in anythng but an erratic and sporadic manner, and by the frequent lock-ups when calculating a change of route.

I've submitted an official bug report to ALK, but of course there has been no repsonse.

I can't justify chucking £135 and starting again so am now totally dependent on ALK sorting out these problems. However, I must say that when CPL works correctly, it is very good, and I especially like the ability to plan routes on the PC and then download them.
_________________
Nokia E65 & TT Nav6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rattle
Occasional Visitor


Joined: 12/08/2003 11:04:51
Posts: 44
Location: Munich, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing I would say it's the lambs that are braying and the wolves (ALK) are keeping their silence having sheared enough wool off us to keep them going on developing version six with yet another set of bells and whistles and most of the old bugs still there. Will this decrease the share of the new users? Unlikely, as the new users are attracted by the bells and whistles assuming everything else is okay. Will this decimate the already existing upgrade sector considerably? Also unlikely, as for most of CP users the bugs are not critical - you have workarounds and can live with them and therefore you don't dump the software. Plus you'll be upgrading because you hope that the bugs are be fixed, like with version 5 Smile
So why would they bother, really? Rolling Eyes

Cheers,
Eriks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
topgazza
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think most are attracted by the basic function, route planning, but I take your point. Reading the reviews here and the reading the users complaints here also I would be very confused as a potential buyer and would probably go for TT3 if I had my time again. So I think it is causing ALK some serious credibility issues.

I'll stick to it for now but I am definately keeing my options open for the future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Sep 10, 2003
Posts: 6460
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AFAIK ALK are still working on fixes, they have gone a long way to tracking down the memory problems, but a lot appear to be down to what setup people have, e.g. how much memory is available, what programs are running in memory etc. It can be difficult replicating some of the problems when you can't fully replicate it in a test environment 100% of the time.

For instance on the SmartPhone I have trouble free running providing I have soft reset the phone prior to use and don't use any other applications. Once I start running other applications these stay resident in memory and if you manually close them they don't always give back the full amount of memory there was before they ran, and this can create memory issues for other apps that require large amounts of memory, e.g. CoPilot.

Similar problems arise with the PPC version. AFAIK ALK are addressing the POI Alerts on both PPC and SmartPhone, and the Memory Leaks, and they're a good way through resolving these. I can't say when a patch will be available as I know no more than you do at the moment but I'll try and find out what I can.

I think everyone has to bring this into perspective though, it's not JUST ALK that are having problems here. Look at other companies...

- TeleType (problems with routing)
- Destinator (problems with routing and no roundabout support)
- TomTom (Constant crashes on newer updates, TTBT stack issues hogging COM port, Routing Issues, no M6 toll road)
- ALK (Memory Leaks, POI Alert problems, Routing issues)
- Navman (Routing issues, Map Display problems)
- Mapopolis (Routing Issues, Problems stitching maps together - Population limit)
- Navigon (Memory Leaks, Large amount of memory required)

When you start listing a lot of the main complaints for each of these applications you start to see a bigger picture that every application is far from perfect. Some are more perfect than others, or appear more perfect with better user interfaces etc, some applications only exhibit routing issues in certain areas of the country or countries, so this can sometimes be down to geodata provided or geocoding, or simply something has screwed up in the compression or making the files public. However, you do have to look at the big picture. I'm not saying it's right that you have problems, I'm just saying it's not just CoPilot that experiences problems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
xda
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1199
Location: Park Gate

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

topgazza wrote:
I think most are attracted by the basic function, route planning, but I take your point. Reading the reviews here and the reading the users complaints here also I would be very confused as a potential buyer and would probably go for TT3 if I had my time again. So I think it is causing ALK some serious credibility issues.

I'll stick to it for now but I am definately keeing my options open for the future.


When I bought CP5, the two features that persuaded me were the more up todate maps and the ability to pre plan routes on the PC and copy them over to the PDA, even though I already had TomTom v2 upgraded to v3. Having stuck with CP5 from it's release untill the beginning of this year. Using way points to get around the always routing via major road problems, Lockups at the most inapropiate times and poor POI announcement. I decided to switch back to TomTom.
What a suprise, my original TT v3.02 which caused lockups if I used CheckPOInt 2.0.2 and pockergps_UK_gatso was the other reason for moving to CP5.
I then found that TomTom had been upgraded through v3.03, 3.04 and was now on v3.07.
Having installed v3.07. CheckPOInt 2.0.2, Niel Thosen's ukpostcode program, and the latest pocketgps camera database with the Gatso and Mobile cameras split into speed related .ov2 and bmp files giving a total of 34 POI files on the storage card with a further 10 wav files giving the voice anouncements, my XDA 2 is working perfectly. No lockups, no missed POI's. Whilst the map data may not be as up to date as CP5 that I can live with.
If TomTom can come up with 5 upgrades since it's release that correct known problems and cosidering that TomTom was a quarter of the price of CP5 for the upgrade from V2 to V3 then ALK need to come up with something very special to make me change back.
_________________
Graham.
TT Go720, App:9.510(1234792.1) OS:842337
GPS: V1.20, Boot: 5.5279, Home: V2.9.5.3093
Map: Europe V910.4892
Map: Europe_Truck V870.3421, Kingston 8GB SD
Nokia 925 Windows 8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
topgazza
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave, and not for the first time, I agree with what you are saying. As I said config issues, finger trouble, expecting play and go etc etc all contribute to a bad experience. But xda point is spot on as well. For me its not the fcat that CP5 has problems its that their response is unbelivably shoddy. Or should I say lack of response. The issues they can address that are consistant are, in my view, very fixable. The POI notification is only one such basic problem.

I am sure as you say they are working on it. But what are they working on? A company who, in my view, need to boost the negative eperience of quite a lot of people would be better served by publiclly acknowledging at least some of the issues and state "like other companies we are seeking to fix them and issuea free upgrade/patch" or words to that effect. Its not admitting anything more than they are working on continuous improvements. I work for a company that does that with its software all the time. the scale is different but the principle is the same. (No not Microsoft, wash your mouth out) As I keep saying, I like CP5 but as xda says that if TT3 can do it........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
xda
Lifetime Member


Joined: Mar 11, 2004
Posts: 1199
Location: Park Gate

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave wrote:

I think everyone has to bring this into perspective though, it's not JUST ALK that are having problems here. Look at other companies...

- TeleType (problems with routing)
- Destinator (problems with routing and no roundabout support)
- TomTom (Constant crashes on newer updates, TTBT stack issues hogging COM port, Routing Issues, no M6 toll road)
- ALK (Memory Leaks, POI Alert problems, Routing issues)
- Navman (Routing issues, Map Display problems)
- Mapopolis (Routing Issues, Problems stitching maps together - Population limit)
- Navigon (Memory Leaks, Large amount of memory required)


Whilst I only have two of the above, for me TomTom have eliminated the initial problems I had.
(Constant crashes on newer updates), I'm on 3.07 and no crashes in the last 2 weeks and no soft resets.
(TTBT Stack issues), I don't use BT
(Routing problems), nothing that an avoid hasn't solved
(No M6 road toll), That I can live with as I dont travel that far north.
TomTom have at least issued updates that for me have produced a very stable setup.

Alk have issued one patch that did nothing to improve the product,
(Memory Leaks), Still a major problem for most.
(POI Alerts), Ok for the first few announcements then nothing.
(Routing Problems), Can be corrected on the PC by pre planning a route and adding waypoint to correct, not so easy on PPC.

I have emailed and phoned ALk more times than I care to remember on the problems and get the same response, "We will look into it and get back to you" the down side is they never do.
You started of this post with AFAIK ALK are still working on fixes. That is not a positive response, and you come over as being very protective of ALK, IF they are still working on these problems then they should be posting update posts to that effect. The fact that TomTom support leaves a lot to be desired, ALK have them beat hands down without trying.
_________________
Graham.
TT Go720, App:9.510(1234792.1) OS:842337
GPS: V1.20, Boot: 5.5279, Home: V2.9.5.3093
Map: Europe V910.4892
Map: Europe_Truck V870.3421, Kingston 8GB SD
Nokia 925 Windows 8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mark1968
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Mar 01, 2004
Posts: 290
Location: Northampton

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had already purchased TomTomv2, then the Upgrade to V3, I was persuaded from reading the review on this website to move over to CoPilot so that I could get better route planning as I often tow a Caravan and thought that the RV mode would be my answer.

My main issues with this product is that the 3 display screen is not a clear as it could be and it sometimes very confusing, not helped by the lack of voice instructions at some junctions. Also the delay in getting the Traffic option released. I am very very disappointed by the complete lack of feed back from ALK and now regret my decision in forking out the money to purchase their software.

I have since moved back over to TomTom and having learnt how to use the avoid area, and road speed options I am very happy with that product.

Having CeBit coming up in March I expect that TomTom will be releasing this years product for the PDA and wonder if CoPolot are intending to do the same.

If this is the case have been working on fixing the product for the next release ignoring the user base?
_________________
Please follow me on twitter @mdyson1968
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
jdw7
Occasional Visitor


Joined: 24/12/2002 10:47:33
Posts: 46
Location: United Kingdom

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave,
Has the original gushing review of this product been amended to reflect the problems encountered ?

Also - is there a legal definition of "shorlty" ? as is "Optional Real Time Traffic alert service and avoidance of traffic incidents available shortly" which has been on their website since launch last summer (IIRC).

I've emailed them about this and, of course, got no reply - I'll be wanting my money back shortly if they don't deliver on this.[/b]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
topgazza
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Shortly" , depending on any other words used in the overall stement is normally interpreted in this context as meaning in a short period of time (seems obvious I know). What that is, is open to definition but a Judge would probably take the view that several months is not short or reasonable, the latter is the key weight on the arguement. Also if the reason for buying was guided by the promise, because thats what it is, of some feature that has not been delivered in a reasonable time frame then yes you could claim your money back. A definition in this case depends on the Judge. he may decide that the ad was not intended to mislead but my legal eagle at work says that whilst it is a slightly grey area they tend to er on the side of the consumer where a manufacturer makes statements that could be deemed misleading. Even if the non delivery of the feature is due to a genuine reason. they have a duty to inform and provide some guidance on a date.

If ALK had said " this year" or "as soon as available" they would be on firmer ground. You would have a prima facia case depending on all the facts though but any half decent supplier would not even allow the debate to go that far, I would hope.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rattle
Occasional Visitor


Joined: 12/08/2003 11:04:51
Posts: 44
Location: Munich, Germany

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do I already hear the drone of a lynch mob at the front of the courthouse? Smile

Why not give ALK a chance and help them here? I mean, shouting that CP does crappy routing and then demanding a fix of the bug is easy and satisfying. But, honestly, did any of you say what you really wanted? It's easy to say that something is broken, it's another to say how you would like it to be fixed. So, what would you like CP routing to be? Good? Define good. As good as Garmin Quest? You mean exactly the same as Garmin Quest? No? What then? Would you like to go from London to Dublin via back yards and unsealed dirt roads just because it makes the route 5% shorter? Well, maybe some of you would, but some would not. As it happens I'm more or less statisfied with CP routing. In Germany at least, the quickest routes are always via motorways even if the distances are larger that way - you simply get there faster, and that's logical because I select Quickest to get somewhere quicker. And, as a matter of fact, I would not want to have to drive unsealed roads even if I chose Shortest. On the other hand, I cannot accept the issue of CP refusing to accept reality and refusing to re-route when I veer of the planned path, something which seems not to be a problem for most of the others here... So what should ALK do - what seems reasonable for one user, is not reasonable for another. Ok, in case of routing, a road preference menu like in the desktop version would probably satisfy most of us as it would introduce the _possibility_ of going down the dirst roads, not that I think anyone would actually drive there Wink But for other problems that are not straightworward, the programmer has to know how to fix them.
What I'm saying is that if ALK rushed in to fix every fault someone reported to them as they (ALK) saw fit, they would get ten bug reports the next day saying why did you change that, I loved it that way. Doesn't go for all the problems of course but you get the drift.

I'm not talking about traffic or other things promised but not delivered at all (are there any, actually, besides traffic?).

I think here's how we could help ALK see the real picture in a constructive way (or at least try):

1) set up a poll that all of CoPilot users could take to indicate their overall satisfaction level - that would give the idea of whether the problems really are severe with the majority (since mostly the dissatisfied post here, it gives the impression things are really, really bad, I mean, abysmal Smile ).

2) start a kind of like the wishlist thread only for bugs, but not the "it doesn't calculate reasonable routes" kind, as these don't really help anyone. One post for one bug. Read before you post so that same bugs aren't posted twice, describe specifically (including location(s) it happens, as opposed to something like "very high number of places") and say how you would like to see it (not just 'fixed' although it would be enough for some I guess). It would be interesting to see how long this thread would get without duplicates, as compared to all the fuss about it. This list then could be the basis for ALK to follow up. For example, Dave or someone from PockepGPS could send them a link so they cannot pretend they didn't see it Smile

Cheers,
Eriks
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
topgazza
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 589
Location: Hampshire, UK

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rattle, I wouldn't expect one of my customer to tell me "how" to fix bugs. I appreciate it when they take the trouble to report problems, and Lord knows theres plenty of them documented on this board. After that its down to me. The problem with CP5 for many is that the basic calculation and comparison algorithm is the issue. A list of "faulty" routes would take forever to collate and fix. They need to attack the basic programming and, I suspect, a large proportion of the problems would disappear. They are not unique as Garmin/TT3 have similar, if not so severe, problems. But this is about ALK the others can sort their own problems out.

I think the fact that so many people have and are posting on this board on this issue shows it is a real problem for ALK. They make money out of us so they deserve to accept the the stick and the plaudits in equal measure. There is no doubt that a reasonable number of problems are as Dave says, either finger, config, memory and a variety of other compatability issues as well. Underlining all this is the routing problem which is, again, a pretty basic programming issue. I tried a friends PDA with TT3 and found it a nightmare trying to get used to it after CP5. That sort of changeover issue causes grief as well, and disilusionment which comes out in some of the posts for sure. To be fair ALK can't The wish list is pretty big as well here with added features and improvements to existing. Sorry to keep repeating this but I use CP5 and have had very little trouble. I love the PC version for route planning and after afew months can tweak it pretty good to give me a faultless, nearly, planning.

Its ALKs silence that puzzles me. I'm sure its not arrogance but ignoring your customers is not the way to go.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Skippy
Pocket GPS Verifier
Pocket GPS Verifier


Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12
Posts: 2946
Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rattle wrote:
So, what would you like CP routing to be? Good? Define good. As good as Garmin Quest?

In Germany at least, the quickest routes are always via motorways even if the distances are larger that way - you simply get there faster, and that's logical because I select Quickest to get somewhere quicker. And, as a matter of fact, I would not want to have to drive unsealed roads even if I chose Shortest.


No Sat Nav system is perfect, but CoPilot would do well to take a look at how Garmin do it, as it's a fair benchmark of what a quality sat nav system can achieve. Maybe Garmin is one of the best in the business and this is why I am so disappointed with CoPilot?

As for specifics, I would be satisfied if if the route it supplied as being the "Quickest" was within +/- 5% of the Quickest route that I could calculate manually by looking at a map.

I would also be satisfied if the route described as the "Shortest" avoided unsealed roads and gave me a route which was within +/- 5% of the shortest route I could calculate manually by looking at a map. (Garmin has an option to try to avoid unsealed roads, by the way).

The problem is that the "Quickest" route is not always via the motorway. CoPilot doesn't accept this and is hell bent on routing you via a motorway regardless of the fact that a major road exists which would be a far better route.

Perhaps the Autobahns are better laid out in Germany and so you don't notice the quirks of CoPilot's routing so much. Confused
_________________
Gone fishing!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gripp
Regular Visitor


Joined: Oct 06, 2004
Posts: 178
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My wishlist is simple:

1. Fix the sporadic lack of POI announcements

2. Fix the PDA hanging when re-calculating re-routes

Once this basic functionality is fixed, then you can indulge in the intellectual discussion about shortest/quickent/autobahn routes.
_________________
Nokia E65 & TT Nav6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> CoPilot Live All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping