| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| M8TJT wrote: | Then do like TomTom do when they have a minor problem (or not) with a feature. Remove the facility all together  |
Alternatively, go down the route of reset, reboot, reinstall - all whilst denying ever having heard of any such issue/challenge.
And tell them it doesn't have any effect unless they are driving Nitro Monsters with 0-90 veloceration rates which should not be on the road in the first place!
And establish a support policy of responding within 48 working hours of the questions being submitted (or should that be 35 working hours under the working time directive?).
Or adopt the TomTom Discussions Forum policy of deleting uncomfortable posts and suspending offenders for a week at a time. 
_________________
Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bmuskett
Lifetime Member
Joined: May 12, 2006
Posts: 710
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DennisN wrote: | | Or adopt the TomTom Discussions Forum policy of deleting uncomfortable posts and suspending offenders for a week at a time. |
Of course PGPSW would never do anything like that.
Would you care to publish the deleted posts that resulted in Capvermell being banned for life? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DennisN
Tired Old Man
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 14889
Location: Keynsham
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bmuskett wrote: | | DennisN wrote: | | Or adopt the TomTom Discussions Forum policy of deleting uncomfortable posts and suspending offenders for a week at a time. |
Of course PGPSW would never do anything like that.
Would you care to publish the deleted posts that resulted in Capvermell being banned for life? |
I can't be sure, as I don't do banning here, but my memory seems to be that he was banned for slagging off PGPSW on another site, but had been allowed to vent off virtually unchecked here. I'm afraid I can't publish his deleted posts from TT Discussions Forum either.
_________________
Dennis
If it tastes good - it's fattening.
Two of them are obesiting!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bmuskett
Lifetime Member
Joined: May 12, 2006
Posts: 710
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah, how soon we forget. His complaint was about the treatment he received from a moderator. Those posts of yours were deleted from these forums. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15134
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
bmuskett, what's your purpose in this thread at the moment? Well, other than trying to stir up trouble?
For those not familiar with the incident from November 2009 (over 2 years ago!) the user 'Capvermell' accused us of breaching the Data Protection Act. These allegations were investigated (as we are legally required to do so) alongside the Data Commissioner for clarification. The outcome was that no offence had taken place. Emails were exchanged explaining the outcome to all parties yet Capvermell continued to abuse us in the forum posts so the threads were locked - it was a pointless discussion. Capvermell continued to start more and more posts and so he was banned and his subscription refunded in full.
It was a very rare occurrence. He accused us in public. This accusation was unfounded. He continued to accuse us even after proving that he was wrong. We acted fairly and legally investigating his claims to the full but the abuse and accusations still continued.
I am not willing to discuss the incident again as it is not relevant to a GPS discussion forum.
MaFt |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Duddy
Lifetime Member
Joined: Dec 09, 2006
Posts: 219
Location: Manchester UK
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good reply MaFt.
Now back on subject 
With reference to 253's response (above) I too have a HTC Desire on 2.2.2 but have no problems using CoPilot 8 + CamerAlert but I have made sure I've moved as many apps as possible to the SD card and made sure I have at least 25Mb free internally on the phone.
I agree the Desire is short on internal memory but it's getting "long in the tooth", it was state of the art when released.
I've only 2 months left on my contract so I'll be looking for a new phone with larger internal memory but staying with the Android system.
As an aside if you have Kindle in your phone, go for the latest update, it appears to release approx 10Mb of internal memory even when it was installed onto the SD card previously
_________________
HUAWEI P30 Pro (new edition) with Speedtrap Alert & alcatel1 for SatNav
CoPilot 10 with CamerAlert
RoadHawk in-car video
Reading glasses getting thicker as is my waist
Retired but want to go back to work for a rest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
![]() Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Forum FAQ
Search
Usergroups
Profile
Log in for private messages
Log in
