View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
RobBrady Frequent Visitor
Joined: Jul 21, 2004 Posts: 2718 Location: Chelmsford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:23 pm Post subject: Family Blames Sat Nav For Four Days of Misery |
|
|
Yet again, some unfortunates have been left stranded due to an over reliance on their sat nav.
The Telegraph reports that a British couple, along with their son, his friend and their dog were relocating from Brisbane to Perth when their sat nav directed them down a muddy dirt track in the Australian Outback.
That simple error stranded them for four days with limited supplies of water and sandwiches when their vehicle slipped into a ditch and became stuck in thick mud due to ongoing torrential rain in the area.
They were in fact very lucky that their situation was not a lot worse... they actually managed to get a signal on their phone and called the Australian police for help.
The police gave them an answer they probably didn't quite expect. They informed them that the continuing storm was making the terrain so bad that they wouldn't be able to rescue them for several days.
An official helicopter was not available for the rescue and, because it wasn't a medical emergency, there was no possibility of an ambulance aircraft either.
The family were given two choices - pay $4000 (£2290) for a non-emergency chopper or wait until the storm subsided, hence the long wait. _________________ Robert Brady |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anita Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Mar 15, 2006 Posts: 3219 Location: Windlesham, Surrey
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Britons stranded in Australian Outback for 4 days after satnav error |
Quote: | Unaware of signs warning that the road in far western New South Wales was closed due to torrential rain, they pushed on. |
How was it a satnav error? From the second quote it would appear that the road was normally navigable, but was closed due to the adverse weather, with warning signs.
What does "Unaware of signs" mean? If there were signs and they were paying attention surely they would have seen them, and if they had any common sense at all they'd realise that it would be wise to stick to a surfaced road during torrential rain in the outback, rather than turn onto a dirt track. _________________ Anita
TomTom VIA 135 - App 12.075
UK map 1125.12264
Samsung Galaxy S21 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mostdom Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Jul 10, 2006 Posts: 1964 Location: Surrey, UK.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anita wrote: | What does "Unaware of signs" mean? |
SIGNS - Lack of road surface, lack of road, lack of common sence, Lack of 4x4 on muddy road, Lack of accual SIGNS. _________________ Dom
HERE LIES PND May it rest in peace.
Navigon 7310/iPhone Navigon&Copilot |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stranded because they are idiots, nothing to do with satnav. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anita Pocket GPS Moderator
Joined: Mar 15, 2006 Posts: 3219 Location: Windlesham, Surrey
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was delighted to see the police wouldn't send a helicopter in to rescue them unless they paid for it, but made them sit it out until until they could be reached by road. I don't somehow think that would happen in the UK - the taxpayer would be expected to pay for it! _________________ Anita
TomTom VIA 135 - App 12.075
UK map 1125.12264
Samsung Galaxy S21 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skippy Pocket GPS Verifier
Joined: 24/06/2003 00:22:12 Posts: 2946 Location: Escaped to the Antipodies! 36.83°S 174.75°E
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why were they trying to drive that far anyway? That's an epic journey to make, ~3,000 miles. _________________ Gone fishing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The trouble is I'm increasingly wary of any storied like this reported in the press. They're invariably wrong on many counts and the chances are the real story is very different.
If they're 'relocating' then they must be Oz residents for starters, so that'd make them ex-pats if anything, not British, wouldn't it? _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ripeda Occasional Visitor
Joined: Dec 15, 2008 Posts: 8 Location: Essex, UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anita wrote: | I was delighted to see the police wouldn't send a helicopter in to rescue them unless they paid for it, but made them sit it out until until they could be reached by road. I don't somehow think that would happen in the UK - the taxpayer would be expected to pay for it! |
In the UK the Law would allow them to sue the organisation who didn't drop everything and come running to rescue them and probably the manufacturer of the Sat Nav. Both probably for millions.
However no rights Law exists allowing those organisations to claim back costs from them for being bloody idiots with no common sense and needing their backsides wiping constantly! (No pun intended in this case) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Darren Frequent Visitor
Joined: 11/07/2002 14:36:40 Posts: 23848 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
ripeda wrote: | In the UK the Law would allow them to sue the organisation who didn't drop everything and come running to rescue them and probably the manufacturer of the Sat Nav. |
Uh no it wouldn't. Emergency Services are not required to attend you if there is no danger to life. As long as they could demonstrate that they assessed the situation and were satisfied that no risk existed, then that would be that.
And no SatNav manufacturer can be held liable even if the mapping data is blatantly wrong. The terms of use are clearly worded to remove liability for the idiocy of users. _________________ Darren Griffin |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JimmyTheHand Frequent Visitor
Joined: Apr 16, 2005 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anita wrote: | How was it a satnav error? |
Because it is missing a vital line of code
Code: | if (user.getIntelligenceLevel() == idiot) halt; |
_________________ J. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JimmyTheHand wrote: | Code: | if (user.getIntelligenceLevel() == idiot) halt; |
| Does not the litteral 'idiot' need to go into quotes? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigPerk Frequent Visitor
Joined: Sep 06, 2006 Posts: 1618 Location: East Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No, he needs to go into a nice, safe, vehicleandsatnav-free institution. _________________ David
(Navigon 70 Live, Nuvi 360) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JimmyTheHand Frequent Visitor
Joined: Apr 16, 2005 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
M8TJT wrote: | JimmyTheHand wrote: | Code: | if (user.getIntelligenceLevel() == idiot) halt; |
| Does not the litteral 'idiot' need to go into quotes? |
Not if it was a named constant defined elsewhere _________________ J. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
M8TJT The Other Tired Old Man
Joined: Apr 04, 2006 Posts: 10118 Location: Bexhill, South Sussex, UK
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was assuming that it was a litteral string, and didn't think of the pre defined variable approach
I think that's enough on this subject Eh! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheQuest Regular Visitor
Joined: Aug 15, 2010 Posts: 81 Location: Kent. UK by the sea
|
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
BigPerk wrote: | No, he needs to go into a nice, safe, vehicleandsatnav-free institution. |
Take Care
TheQuest _________________ When Nothing is Certain, Anything is Possible. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
Posted: Today Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising |
|
|
We see you’re using an ad-blocker. We’re fine with that and won’t stop you visiting the site.
Have you considered making a donation towards website running costs?. Or you could disable your ad-blocker for this site. We think you’ll find our adverts are not overbearing!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|