Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
SurfShark VPN for Streaming TV
Pocket GPS World - SatNavs | GPS | Speed Cameras: Forums

Pocket GPS World :: View topic - Speed Camera Support Declines
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in for private messagesLog in for private messages   Log inLog in 

Speed Camera Support Declines

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RobBrady
Frequent Visitor


Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 2718
Location: Chelmsford, UK

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:30 pm    Post subject: Speed Camera Support Declines Reply with quote

pocketgpsworld.comThe UK Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have collated results from polls conducted by NOP for the AA since 1999 about attitudes to speed cameras. They report that over the last 10 years there has been a marked decline in their popularity.

Back in 1999, speed cameras had a huge overall approval rating of 92 per cent compared with just 75 per cent in 2009.

According to the data, support from men has fallen quite dramatically from 83 per cent in 2002 to 66 per cent in 2009. The research also shows that women are more supportive of speed cameras than men. The IAM speculate that because women commit fewer traffic offences than men, they may see cameras as less of a threat.

Maybe unsurprisingly, high mileage drivers, who travel over 20,000 miles a year, were found to be the least supportive of speed cameras.

The study claims that younger people have a more positive attitude to speed cameras than older drivers, with 17-24 year-olds giving the highest approval to cameras over all age groups. Drivers over 45 show the less favour to speed cameras giving the lowest overall approval ratings.

The IAM, said: "Young people don’t tend to drive as frequently or as far as the average driver, and they have also grown up in a surveillance society, which could explain why they show less objection to safety cameras – older people are more likely to resent being monitored in this way."

Maybe overall approval ratings will start to increase as younger generations grow older, or maybe the cynicism of experience (being caught once or twice!) will eventually kick in?

_________________
Robert Brady
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
G1LIW
Lifetime Member


Joined: Jun 19, 2006
Posts: 212
Location: Sahrf Lunnon ;)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or maybe, just maybe, we older farts have realised that the government thinks of us as a handy cashpoint machine? Evil or Very Mad
_________________
Roger, G1LIW
Google Pixel 3a XL Android Smartphone | SatNav Sygic for Android | Waze for Android | CamerAlert for Android | Blog http://rogersblant.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gl3n
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Central Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 6:15 pm    Post subject: It is what they don't catch Reply with quote

The trouble with cameras is that there is no discretion used as to the road conditions and any other circumstances. More police cars or checks for people using phones, being drunk or using drugs would get people on-side.

The number of people I see driving like complete idiots (drifting between lanes, no indicators etc.) when using a mobile phone is not decreasing because they are not being caught and dealt with. Nor is the driver who hogs an outside lane for no reason. These can only be dealt with by a police officer in a car who sees their behaviour. A camera doesn’t spot or deal with those offences.

Positioning a speed camera on a dual carriageway, on the way up a hill, just after a length of single carriageway is just stupid! Why are they not outside schools or other sites where they would do some good? I suspect the number of fines wouldn’t cover the cost of installation at those locations but on a motorway they can rack up the numbers being caught and the revenue.
Until there is a fairness in the way other offences are dealt with speed cameras will always be viewed as another revenue stream for the government.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaFt
Pocket GPS Staff
Pocket GPS Staff


Joined: Aug 31, 2005
Posts: 15126
Location: Bradford, West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

some good points Gl3n - covered recently by the fact that swindon have disabled their static cameras (ie they cost too much to run and aren't making enough money therefore clearly revenue earners and NOT safety [if they were safety then they would pay the cost regardless!]) and the fella who got a redlight ticket for moving out a police vans way (a real copper as opposed to a cameras would have been able to differentiate between a real offence and moving out a coppers way!!)

MaFt
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
navver
Regular Visitor


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 111
Location: Chipping Sodbury

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I feel very sorry for the high milage business driver. Unless they pay a lot of attention to the current limit and their speed, which is difficult to do on unfamiliar roads, it is very easy to get caught. The more miles they drive the more likely they are to get caught and the more they are likely to stop concentrating for a while as they drift into auto pilot mode. The limits change so frequently, its very difficult to remember. Yet their livelihoods depend on not getting caught.

The cameras also take reponsibility for assessing a suitable speed from the driver. Drivers are turned into automated morons with one eye on the speedo and the other looking for cameras and limit signs. Makes it impossible to properly concentrate on the road and surrounding conditions. Speed is the only thing we have to watch.

With the increase in the number of average speed systems this will get even worse.

The reason why approval is falling is that more people have been mugged by these things. With the increase in the number of cameras the approval will continue to fall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
navver
Regular Visitor


Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Posts: 111
Location: Chipping Sodbury

PostPosted: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This sums it all up well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcy5tpDARNc&feature=related
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BrightonJohn
Occasional Visitor


Joined: Sep 15, 2005
Posts: 22

PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strikes me that after all these years 75% shows a pretty solid public vote of confidence. I'm all for these devices and the sooner they can sense the use of a mobile phone in the hands of a driver the better I shall be pleased - not to mention drivers who smoke while in control of a car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website







Posted: Today    Post subject: Pocket GPS Advertising

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Pocket GPS World Forum Index -> News And Latest Information All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Make a Donation



CamerAlert Database

Click here for the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database

Download Speed Camera Database
22.034 (27 Mar 24)



WORLDWIDE SPEED CAMERA SPOTTERS WANTED!

Click here to submit camera positions to the PocketGPSWorld.com Speed Camera Database


12mth Subscriber memberships awarded every week for verified new camera reports!

Submit Speed Camera Locations Now


CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy


GPS Shopping