Home PageFacebookRSS News Feed
PocketGPS
Web
SatNav,GPS,Navigation
Driver Accused Of Speeding 10 Times In 6 Weeks


Article by: rob brady
Date: 14 Mar 2017

pocketgpsworld.com
Get Speed Camera Warnings For SatNavs
Get Speed Camera Warnings For iOS (iPhone and iPad)
Get Speed Camera Warnings For Android (phones and tablets)

A driver from Lowestoft, Suffolk has been accused of ten speeding offences in the space of just six weeks.

The majority of the alleged offences were caught by average speed cameras on the A14 at the Orwell Bridge, just south of Ipswich - the point-to-point cameras were first activated in July.

Mercedes driver, 42-year-old Yilmaz Kalayci, faces 10 offences of speeding, two occurring on the same day. The highest alleged speed was 90mph on a 60mph stretch.

Mr Kalayci is set to appear at South East Suffolk Magistrates’ Court in Ipswich on March 24th.

Source

email icon
Comments
Posted by DennisN on Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:04 pm Reply with quote

Dare we hope that after 24th March another Merc driver will no longer be troubling us?


Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

 
Posted by Kremmen on Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:26 pm Reply with quote

Unless he's going to try and beat that 62 point driver.


Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :

 
Posted by IanS100 on Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:09 pm Reply with quote

Kremmen Wrote:
Unless he's going to try and beat that 62 point driver.


I'd love to know how someone can accrue that many points without losing their licence, as they're are apparently a further 3 motorists still driving around with 51, 42 and 39 points Shocked


Galaxy Note 4 / TomTom GO : CamerAlert : CoPilot

 
Posted by Kremmen on Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:42 am Reply with quote

All I can think of is that the magistrates don't know the drivers history so are treating each one on a case by case basis.


Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :

 
Posted by DennisN on Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:17 am Reply with quote

Surely the magistrate knows the history - that's how they know to issue a ban for topping up. And I thought it was normal to hide the records until the verdict comes in then consider the records at sentencing stage.

The way they get so many without being banned is by successfully pleading that if they get banned they'll suffer terrible hardship.


Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

 
Posted by Kremmen on Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:11 am Reply with quote

Which, in my book, is a good reason to ban them on the basis they knew the risks when they sped, umpteen times.

You will be taken from here to a place of execution ...............


Satnav:
Garmin 2599 LMT-D (Indoor test rig)
DashCam:
Viofo A119 V3
Car Average MPG :

 
Posted by sussamb on Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:54 am Reply with quote

DennisN Wrote:

The way they get so many without being banned is by successfully pleading that if they get banned they'll suffer terrible hardship.


Really? I can understand perhaps that happening the first time they go over 12 points since there may be extenuating circumstances depending on how they accrued the points but surely after that there should be no leeway given Evil or Very Mad


Where there's a will ... there's a way.

 
Posted by DennisN on Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:54 am Reply with quote

If I was a magistrate there wouldn't be any leeway. If there's any gap between points they've already had the warning. The only SLIGHT consideration is this guy seems to be getting all his points at one time. Nevertheless, ten times isn't just "inadvertently, unintentionally, slightly, drifting", it's deliberate speeding, nothing less.

The thing that bothers me is apparently a ban clears the points so once the ban ends they're free to start topping up again - I'd leave them with nine so that a repeat gets them off the road again. Smile


Dennis

If it tastes good - it's fattening.

Two of them are obesiting!!

 
Posted by sussamb on Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:45 pm Reply with quote

DennisN Wrote:
The thing that bothers me is apparently a ban clears the points so once the ban ends they're free to start topping up again - I'd leave them with nine so that a repeat gets them off the road again. Smile


Great idea!!


Where there's a will ... there's a way.

 
Posted by IanS100 on Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:36 am Reply with quote

DennisN Wrote:
The way they get so many without being banned is by successfully pleading that if they get banned they'll suffer terrible hardship.


Most people would be suffering terrible hardship from 62 points with of fines alone, but the cost clearly doesn't deter him.


Galaxy Note 4 / TomTom GO : CamerAlert : CoPilot

 
Posted by marksfish on Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:03 pm Reply with quote

How do you get car insurance with 62 points? Can you imagine filling out the convictions boxes?


Garmin Drivesmart 51 LMT-D Europe

 
Click here to view more comments...
Reply to topic

CamerAlert Apps



iOS QR Code






Android QR Code







© Terms & Privacy

GPS Shopping